+1 (non-binding)
Thanks JB!
regards,
François
On 14/02/2022 23:42, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
+1
Jon
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 6:47 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
Hi all,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.4 release to your vote (take #3).
This release includes important fixes and updates on t
Hi all,
this vote passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Christopher Shannon, JB Onofré, Timothy Bish, Clebert Suconic
+1 (non binding): Etienne Hossack, Robbie Gemmell, Matt Pavlovich,
Colm O'hEigeartaigh, Charlie Chen, Jon Gallimore
I'm promoting the artifacts to Maven Central and dis
+1
Jon
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 6:47 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.4 release to your vote (take #3).
>
> This release includes important fixes and updates on the 5.16.x
> series, especially:
> - log4j 1.x has been replaced by reload4j including the la
Hi Team,
+1 (non-binding)
All of our internal tests passed for ActiveMQ 5.16.4. Looking forward to seeing
it in public!
Thanks,
Charlie Chen
Software Development Engineer, Amazon MQ
email: chenc...@amazon.com
On 2022-02-14, 6:54 AM, "Clebert Suconic" wrote:
+1 binding
On Mon, F
+1 binding
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 8:03 AM Timothy Bish wrote:
> On 2/11/22 13:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.4 release to your vote (take #3).
> >
> > This release includes important fixes and updates on the 5.16.x
> > series, especially:
> > -
On 2/11/22 13:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.4 release to your vote (take #3).
This release includes important fixes and updates on the 5.16.x
series, especially:
- log4j 1.x has been replaced by reload4j including the latest security fixes
- fix OSGi impo
+1 (non-binding).
Colm.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 4:28 AM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks JB for working the release! Excited to get this one out, a lot of nice
> improvements.
>
> Thanks to Chris for contributing on the max frame size unit tests.
>
> Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Feb 11, 2022,
You should post such questions to the users list, not the dev list.
I replied to the StackOverflow post this time so as to close out this
thread, and also as though some of the necessary detail to suggest
anything was here, as much of it was there.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 14:30, Veena g wrote:
>
