Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Remove Artemis Javadoc from the ActiveMQ website...

2022-09-29 Thread Tetreault, Lucas
+1 I've never used the javadocs on the website and as Robbie said it makes building the site incredibly slow so testing changes locally is really painful. At the very least, it would be great to host them separately outside of the Jekyll website. - Lucas On 2022-09-29, 12:11 PM,

[ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.26.0 Released

2022-09-29 Thread Clebert Suconic
I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis . Downloads are now available at: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/ For a complete list of updates: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.26.0 This release has bug fixes and

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Remove Artemis Javadoc from the ActiveMQ website...

2022-09-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Clebert, I'm +1 about this for the two reasons: 1. I don't think lot of people read the Javadoc on website (personally I'm reading directly in the IDE) 2. We can still have the javadoc jar published on Maven (not need to update website) Regards JB On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 6:12 PM Clebert

Re: [DISCUSS/VOTE] Remove Artemis Javadoc from the ActiveMQ website...

2022-09-29 Thread Matt Pavlovich
My $0.02. I’m in favor of hosting javadocs. It is a low effort form of documentation that can fill gaps for configuration options and default values where other forms of docs may not keep up. I’m in favor at minimum the ‘latest’ version of the javadocs for all active (or LTS-style) release