Perfect, thank you Robbie.
Bruce
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:33 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> Justin suggested the website repository for hosting a draft file just
> since it already exists. We both thought just continuing to link to
> the published approved minutes from Whimsy, as the site has for
Assuming that this list of where Jackson is used is correct, I would agree
that we could probably do something simpler.
* DestinationsViewFilter
* PartitionBrokerPlugin
* ZooKeeperPartitionBroker
* Partition & Target classes
* PersistenceAdapterView
There's a couple of drivers for asking for
Do we really need a full JSON stack *in* the broker? Could we not move to some
simplified JSON writers (like what Log4j2 does)? Or model class toString() r
util method implementations that write out valid JSON?
-Matt
> On Oct 10, 2022, at 9:46 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
Hi
Are there any thoughts on this (even if its a hard no, or a different view
on how it might be implemented)?
Thanks
Jon
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:25 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When I originally posted, my hope was that Jackson might be able to
>
Good idea. +1 for that and it looks accurate.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 1:33 PM Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> Justin suggested the website repository for hosting a draft file just
> since it already exists. We both thought just continuing to link to
> the published approved minutes from
Justin suggested the website repository for hosting a draft file just
since it already exists. We both thought just continuing to link to
the published approved minutes from Whimsy, as the site has for some
time, made more sense than actually publishing them to the ActiveMQ
website again (though
Correct, I forgot that.
Unfortunately, I think we didn't prepare anything yet for this report.
I propose you send a report draft directly here (mailing list) for
this time. We will be set for the next report.
Regards
JB
On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 7:46 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> We agreed that all
