+1 (non-binding)
- Internal test suite completed successfully
- Downloaded tar.gz, confirmed scenarios using web console
Thanks!
Matt
> On Mar 19, 2023, at 12:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit ActiveMQ 5.18.0 to
> your vote. This
The package Apache.NMS.AMQP 2.1.0
(https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS.AMQP/2.1.0) was recently published
on NuGet Gallery by Havret. If this was not intended, please contact support
(https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS.AMQP/2.1.0/ReportMyPackage).
The symbol package Apache.NMS.AMQP 2.1.0
(https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS.AMQP/2.1.0) failed validation
because of the following reason(s):
- The uploaded symbols package contains one or more pdbs that are not portable.
Your symbol package was not published on NuGet Gallery and is
Results of the activemq-nms-amqp 2.1.0-rc1 release vote.
The vote passes with 4 Binding Votes
Binding Votes:
Jeff Genender
Clebert Suconic - 2x ;)
Chris Porebski
Arthur Naseef
Non-Binding Votes:
none
Thank you for all the contributions and everyone's time reviewing the
release candidate and
+1 (binding)
Obviously I did a bunch of tests with standalone brokers scenarios.
Regards
JB
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 6:26 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit ActiveMQ 5.18.0 to
> your vote. This release is a major milestone for ActiveMQ
Hi folks,
This is still an issue. I believe the setting to fix this is in
https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/d48cf3758312a25122508854946c399a2e6f6f69/activemq-web/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/web/MessageServletSupport.java
but I am not a java developer and a little confused about how
+1
Cheers,
Jamie
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 8:27 AM Christopher Shannon
wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Overall things look pretty good to me.
>
> * Validated signatures and checksums
> * Verified license and notice files in archives
> * Checked source license headers with 'mvn apache-rat:check'
> *
+1 (binding)
Overall things look pretty good to me.
* Validated signatures and checksums
* Verified license and notice files in archives
* Checked source license headers with 'mvn apache-rat:check'
* Built from source archive and ran several automated custom tests to
verify things look good
*
