This report has been published. Thank you again for your contributions!
Bruce
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 9:13 AM Bruce Snyder wrote:
> Thank you to everyone who has contributed! Most appreciated.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 8:08 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> it looks go
Thank you to everyone who has contributed! Most appreciated.
Bruce
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 8:08 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1
>
> it looks good, thanks !
>
> Sorry I was busy and didn't have time to add content to the report.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:34 PM Robbie Ge
Yup. I propose to update the website with a table with different
versions (as we do in Karaf).
Regards
JB
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 4:08 PM Christopher Shannon
wrote:
>
> Yep, this seems like a good plan to me. If people want to upgrade to
> Jakarta we will have to require Spring 6 (due to the con
Yep, this seems like a good plan to me. If people want to upgrade to
Jakarta we will have to require Spring 6 (due to the configuration) which
requires JDK 17 and I think requiring JDK 17 is reasonable for that version
as JDK 21 is almost out.
I also want to add that we should upgrade 5.18.x to Je
That's exactly my proposal :)
+1
Regards
JB
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 3:57 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> Hi Robbie-
>
> Yep, I’m back to agreeing with planning to move forward with the two separate
> versions is the way to go. Chris Shannon has the jetty continuation thing
> resolved, so that wa
+1
it looks good, thanks !
Sorry I was busy and didn't have time to add content to the report.
Regards
JB
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:34 PM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> I fleshed out the report with the stats + releases etc detail, tweaked
> the earlier additions from Justin and Matt, and reflowed
Hi Robbie-
Yep, I’m back to agreeing with planning to move forward with the two separate
versions is the way to go. Chris Shannon has the jetty continuation thing
resolved, so that was the only potential snag for back porting.
Proposed plan for 5.19.x and to LTS-ify 5.18.x:
5.18.x LTS - JDK 11
Looks good! Thanks, Robbie.
> On Apr 12, 2023, at 5:34 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> I fleshed out the report with the stats + releases etc detail, tweaked
> the earlier additions from Justin and Matt, and reflowed things so it
> can be submitted directly via Whimsy.
>
> https://github.com/apa
I fleshed out the report with the stats + releases etc detail, tweaked
the earlier additions from Justin and Matt, and reflowed things so it
can be submitted directly via Whimsy.
https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/commit/8035b7148bba966f8d72aba682fc8a118cdecbbf
https://github.com/apache/a
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks JB!
regards,
François
On 11/04/2023 11:26, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.1 release to your vote. This release
fixes activemq-client-jakarta where the META-INF/services file was
missing in the artifact.
You can take a look on the Releas
10 matches
Mail list logo
