Last call for contributions to the board report.

Thank you for all the contributions so far. I will submit the report
sometime tomorrow.

Bruce

On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 9:11 AM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> LGTM
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Aug 4, 2023, at 4:51 AM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Noone had added anything yet, it was still just the final report draft
> > I committed for the April meeting and so only mentioned stuff known up
> > to then.
> >
> > I have just written an initial draft for the August (/July) report now
> > and committed it.
> >
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/blob/main/src/team/reports/DRAFT-ActiveMQ-board-report.txt
> >
> > (changes:
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/commit/4795660c1c16346dd37291ed199566f3967bedd3
> > )
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 05:26, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Bruce,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the report !
> >> It looks good to me. About Classic, you mentioned the two releases we
> >> did in June and the work about "Jakarta broker" planned for 5.19.x.
> >>
> >> We will provide more details in the next report (I should have a more
> >> concrete roadmap about 5.19.x just after my vacations).
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 5:22 PM Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We just received the notice to submit a board report by Tuesday, Aug 8.
> >>>
> >>> Obviously this is a very short timeline, so please contribute sooner
> rather
> >>> than later via the following file:
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/blob/main/src/team/reports/DRAFT-ActiveMQ-board-report.txt
> >>>
> >>> All project activity is welcome!
> >>>
> >>> Bruce
> >>> --
> >>> perl -e 'print
> >>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
> >>> http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>
>

-- 
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>

Reply via email to