Re: [DISCUSS] Only count business days for minimum 72 hour vote time

2025-03-20 Thread Clebert Suconic
If I’m ready to release in a Thursday if I wait till Monday to release I might have found things broken and have to wait until next Thursday to be ready again. Kind of half joking. But not totally a lie :) I will try to do it on a Monday or Tuesday next time and if I need a Thursday I will jus

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.16.8 release

2025-03-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 7:54 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Due to important fixes and requests from JDK8 users, I submit Apache > ActiveMQ Classic 5.16.8 to your vote. > > This is a maintenance release on the 5.16.x series (JDK8) including: > - fix Out

Re: [DISCUSS] Only count business days for minimum 72 hour vote time

2025-03-20 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Yep, I like a good Monday/Tuesday vote opening when things suit, both for that and also getting it all over within the same week :) On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 16:37, Christopher Shannon wrote: > > I agree with Robbie, using staging repos is not really an answer for > most users because you are using

[ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.40.0 Released

2025-03-20 Thread Justin Bertram
I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.40.0. * Downloads: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/ * Complete list of updates: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.40.0 I would like to highlight these improvements: - New & Im

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.17.7 release

2025-03-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi folks, this vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): JB Onofré, Clebert Suconic, Christopher Shannon +1 (non binding): Jamie Goodyear, Cesar Hernandez, Jean-Louis Monteiro I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist, updating Jira, etc. Thanks everyone for your vote! R

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.16.8 release

2025-03-20 Thread Ken Liao
+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Ken On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:28 AM Christopher Shannon < christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * Validated signatures and checksums > * Verified license and notice files in archives > * Checked source license headers with 'mvn apache-rat:check' > *

Re: [DISCUSS] Only count business days for minimum 72 hour vote time

2025-03-20 Thread Christopher Shannon
I agree with Robbie, using staging repos is not really an answer for most users because you are using a version that may not be released and cancelled. And I also agree with Robbie's earlier email that it's definitely a balancing act where it is annoying for users who are waiting for a release. I