+1
-dain
On Apr 9, 2015, at 6:06 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for
> the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ
> which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the
> code is not ready to b
My 2 cents.
When it comes to code, I find that there is a lot more concern when things are
talked about in the abstract. Once you have the new code and show how it is
integrated, if it is way better than the current stuff, then there really isn’t
a problem. If it is not better, or just a big
+1
-dain
On Apr 24, 2007, at 10:16 AM, James Strachan wrote:
Some of us have been noodling on the Camel library for a little while.
http://activemq.apache.org/camel/
Its basically a POJO implementation of the Enterprise Integration
Patterns using a typesafe fluent Java language
http://activem
+1
-dain
On Mar 28, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
+1
On 3/26/07, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey folks,
I was able to finally get around to doing a 2nd binary release
candidate
from the 4.1 branch.
it's available here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/activem
Changing the ServerUrl to vm://localhost?async=true made the problem
go away.
Thanks,
-dain
On Mar 5, 2007, at 2:26 AM, Rob Davies wrote:
one way to get around this one is to run vm:// transport with the
async property set to true
On 5 Mar 2007, at 04:08, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I
I'm getting a strange deadlock from ActiveMQ embedded into OpenEJB.
Any ideas?
-dain
Found one Java-level deadlock:
=
"pool-1-thread-2":
waiting to lock monitor 0x01810aa8 (object 0x2747e938, a
org.apache.activemq.broker.region.QueueSubscription),
which is h
: Broker
Affects Versions: 4.1.0
Reporter: Dain Sundstrom
It is not possible to receive a message on an unstarted connection, but
activemq does not warn you when you attempt to do it anyway. When a user tries
this, how about throwing an exception or logging something? In my specific
AMQ-1186
-dain
On Mar 3, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
On 3/3/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about throwing an exception or logging something? In my specific
case I was calling consumer.receive(1000), and it was failing because
the connection was not starte
sumer,
listener, and continue configuring stuff for the consumer without
worrying that the connection will start delivering messages to the
listener that is still being configured. Once everything is
configured, the user would call start()
On 3/3/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
I found the problem I was not calling connection.start().
When do I need to call connection.start() and when do I not need to
call start?
-dain
On Mar 3, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
So what can cause this problem?
-dain
On Mar 3, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
I
So what can cause this problem?
-dain
On Mar 3, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
I only saw 1 "Message Broker (x) is starting" message so it looks
like you only have 1.
On 3/3/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I added the mx4j tools jar and the f
JConsole...
http://activemq.apache.org/jmx.html
which should display what connections & consumers are available, what
their prefetch buffers are looking like and the status of the various
destinations etc. It may be you've got a rogue consumer or something
On 3/3/07, Dain Sundstrom <[
Cleaned up the code... here is the Test and onMessage of the MDB. I
don't care about efficiency right now, but just want it to work
(every time).
TIA,
-dain
public class MdbConnectionFactoryTests extends BasicMdbTestClient {
protected ConnectionFactory connectionFactory;
protec
I have this test case in OpenEJB for our MDB container. The junit
test sends a message to an MDB and the MDB sends a response message
to the junit test using the reply to (temp) queue in the request
message. I've mocked up the architecture using an the RA in a
separate test case and it wo
The answer for anyone reading the logs is to set the resource adapter
property:
BrokerXmlConfig=broker:(tcp://localhost:61616)
-dain
On Mar 1, 2007, at 11:46 PM, James Strachan wrote:
On 3/2/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there anyway to get the ActiveMQResourceA
Is there anyway to get the ActiveMQResourceAdapter to create an
embedded broker without adding spring to my project? I just want a
default broker and don't want to pull in spring and all of its deps.
-dain
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38605
]
Dain Sundstrom commented on AMQ-1165:
-
I think you forgot to commit the test case.
> RegionBroker resets
RegionBroker resets JMS Timestamp
-
Key: AMQ-1165
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1165
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 4.1.0
Reporter: Dain Sundstrom
18 matches
Mail list logo