[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-418) Recovery File Logger does not support multiple concurrent transactions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13777466#comment-13777466 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-418: --- Tom, nobody seems to care about the patches

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-422) Added support for transactions for Asyncronous Listeners

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13777462#comment-13777462 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-422: --- Tom, nobody seems to care about the patches

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-413) Message producers do not respect DTC Transactions correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13662703#comment-13662703 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-413: --- Why is it closed when incomplete???

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-416) DTC Ressource ManagerID must be confugurable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13659907#comment-13659907 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-416: --- Nice!. Thanks a lot! DTC

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-416) DTC Ressource ManagerID must be confugurable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13649309#comment-13649309 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-416: --- Yes it introduces more locking overhead

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-433) Correctly rethrow exceptions without swallowing the stack trace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13645292#comment-13645292 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-433: --- Hy Jim, That is what I consider a correct

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-434) FailoverTransport Memory Leak with TransactionState

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13645293#comment-13645293 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-434: --- We found the root cause of the problem.

[jira] [Updated] (AMQNET-434) FailoverTransport Memory Leak with TransactionState

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Marbach updated AMQNET-434: -- Attachment: ConnectionStateTrackerMemoryLeak.cs Fixes removal of TransactionState in DTC case

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-434) FailoverTransport Memory Leak with TransactionState

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13645295#comment-13645295 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-434: --- Sorry the file should be named .patch.

[jira] [Created] (AMQNET-433) Correctly rethrow exceptions without swallowing the stack trace

Daniel Marbach created AMQNET-433: - Summary: Correctly rethrow exceptions without swallowing the stack trace Key: AMQNET-433 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-433 Project: ActiveMQ

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-413) Message producers do not respect DTC Transactions correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13642782#comment-13642782 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-413: --- Any timeline for this issue?

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-405) Messages are not dequeued when using Two Phase Commit for DTC Transaction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13642783#comment-13642783 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-405: --- Any timeline for this issue? 413 has patch

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-404) ActiveMQByteMessage Content accessing multiple times wipes the property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13642786#comment-13642786 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-404: --- No I didn't call reset. So I close this

[jira] [Created] (AMQNET-434) FailoverTransport Memory Leak with TransactionState

Daniel Marbach created AMQNET-434: - Summary: FailoverTransport Memory Leak with TransactionState Key: AMQNET-434 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-434 Project: ActiveMQ .Net

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-433) Correctly rethrow exceptions without swallowing the stack trace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13643365#comment-13643365 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-433: --- Thank you! I must say I have some issues

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-405) Messages are not dequeued when using Two Phase Commit for DTC Transaction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13580461#comment-13580461 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-405: --- See also patch provided in

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-413) Message producers do not respect DTC Transactions correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13579340#comment-13579340 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-413: --- Hy timothy, I wanted to get the tests to

[jira] [Updated] (AMQNET-413) Message producers do not respect DTC Transactions correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Marbach updated AMQNET-413: -- Attachment: AMQNET-413.patch In the meantime until you guys respond to my issues regarding

[jira] [Commented] (AMQNET-404) ActiveMQByteMessage Content accessing multiple times wipes the property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13558099#comment-13558099 ] Daniel Marbach commented on AMQNET-404: --- Ok. Didn't know that. But this design is

[jira] [Created] (AMQNET-404) ActiveMQByteMessage Content accessing multiple times wipes the property

Daniel Marbach created AMQNET-404: - Summary: ActiveMQByteMessage Content accessing multiple times wipes the property Key: AMQNET-404 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-404 Project: