[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006826#comment-13006826
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
Hi
The problem could appear if you have a loop in your network of br
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12983289#action_12983289
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2821:
---
Without this improvement, is an inactive queue reference (without any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981675#action_12981675
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
Does the 5.5-SNAPSHOT (download page) compiled today (January 14th), i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981314#action_12981314
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
We use ActiveMQ brokers with complex configuration (now we have around
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981295#action_12981295
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
Hi Gary
Thank you very much.
I don't fully understand. Do you mean,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980819#action_12980819
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
Thank you for your information. I think this will be difficult to full
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980787#action_12980787
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
Hi Gary
No news ?
Eric-AWL
> ArraysIndexOutOfBoundsException : -327
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12977669#action_12977669
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
Hi Gary
I wish you an happy new year. How can we progress together on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12974601#action_12974601
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
Hi Gary
Do you have some news for me about this problem after I provi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12973192#action_12973192
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
The patch consists in adding 2 conditions (isUpdateClusterClient()) on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric updated AMQ-3077:
--
Attachment: NetworkOfTwentyBrokersTest.java
TransportConnector.java
TransportConnection.ja
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972529#action_12972529
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
What is the simplest way to simulate a complex network of brokers situ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972495#action_12972495
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
Ok.
I just changed the 2 places by adding the condition (isUpdateClu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972475#action_12972475
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
Is this an acceptable workaround, if I add in TransportConnection.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972415#action_12972415
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
If this important change was made only to provide the "automatic dynam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric updated AMQ-3077:
--
Attachment: activemq_SIBBusSupervisor.xml
activemq_SIBBusModule.xml
activemq_Serveur.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972404#action_12972404
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
I forgot to say that all these brokers are not in the same network of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric updated AMQ-3077:
--
Attachment: bsm.log
the result of the launch of an embedded broker
(sibBusModule-TestDeCharge-td0sib01s)
when "busModu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972117#action_12972117
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
mmmhhh.
I just added this into openwire/v6/BrokerInfoMarshaller.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971735#action_12971735
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
If I add an algorithm that
- adds only the first level of peerbrokers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971568#action_12971568
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
TransportConnection.java
BrokerInfo info = connector.getBrokerInfo()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971206#action_12971206
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
public Response processBrokerInfo(BrokerInfo info) {
if (info
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970765#action_12970765
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
TransportConnection.java
start() in 5.4.1
public void start() throw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970745#action_12970745
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3077:
---
Here is a Gary Tully's comment added on User discussion forum :
That
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric updated AMQ-3077:
--
Since I see a lot of "imbrications" of
at
org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.tightMarshalNestedObject1(OpenWireFo
ArraysIndexOutOfBoundsException : -32768 in "BrokerService[xxx] Task" thread
Key: AMQ-3077
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077
Project: ActiveMQ
Iss
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-3016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=63084#action_63084
]
Eric edited comment on AMQ-3016 at 11/5/10 4:26 AM:
Hi
Since duplex connec
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-3016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=63084#action_63084
]
Eric commented on AMQ-3016:
---
Hi
Since duplex connections are very different from non-duplex one, thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=62356#action_62356
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2935:
---
Hi Andy
I don't need nor scheduled Messages, nor Persistance. So I don'
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=62351#action_62351
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2935:
---
Hi Gary
Do you confirm us that "schedulerSupport=false" is enough when
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=62044#action_62044
]
Eric edited comment on AMQ-2935 at 9/23/10 12:06 PM:
-
When I add
schedulerS
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=62044#action_62044
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2935:
---
en ajoutant
schedulerSupport="false"
dans la configuration "broker", c
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=62040#action_62040
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2935:
---
I upgraded from 5.3.2 to 5.4.1. Some jars (spring) were updated.
If I
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60996#action_60996
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2771:
---
An other side effect of the change, concerns multicast discovery.
- 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60966#action_60966
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
All seems OK. And I think that "tcpfaulty" transport can be reused to ve
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60961#action_60961
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
in the tar file, there are 3 changes for ActiveMQ classes, 6 new test cl
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric updated AMQ-2774:
--
Attachment: activemq-all-5.3.2-eric.jar
The jar with the patch
> Network of brokers : Multicast discovery stopped to
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60958#action_60958
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2776:
---
With multicast discovery, I think I found the problem
My transport conn
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60942#action_60942
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
Yes, with DUPLEX connection, the network connector thread is completely
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60939#action_60939
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
I didn't receive any mail to signal that I just added a new attachment w
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric updated AMQ-2774:
--
Attachment: SocketTstFactory.java
Hi Gary
You will find here a new version of the my own
org.apache.activemq.transp
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60931#action_60931
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2776:
---
In 5.3.2
With two distinct brokers on the same server with a single int
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60930#action_60930
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
At first view, on the 5.4-SNAPSHOT, with the last modification, the
rem
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60917#action_60917
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
Yes, I saw this JUNIT test, and I will try to adapt SocketProxy into the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60911#action_60911
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
Hi Gary
It's very difficult to simulate quick network faults. With my J
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric updated AMQ-2774:
--
Attachment: AMQ2774.tar
I propose you this patch in the tar file (for ActiveMQ 5.3.2 version)
2 modifications are br
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60843#action_60843
]
Eric edited comment on AMQ-2774 at 7/22/10 9:38 AM:
I propose you this patc
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60825#action_60825
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
Hi
I think I now have programmed a clean correction for this specific l
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60616#action_60616
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2693:
---
Problem seems to be localized here
When it works Ok :
09:11:02,704
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60582#action_60582
]
Eric edited comment on AMQ-2774 at 7/11/10 4:26 AM:
If I resume my view of
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60582#action_60582
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
If I resume my view of the problem
When the problem occurs
- Network li
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60582#action_60582
]
Eric edited comment on AMQ-2774 at 7/11/10 4:25 AM:
If I resume my view of
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60482#action_60482
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
We put a no-Duplex Configuration instead of a Duplex Configuration and i
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60450#action_60450
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
What could happen if we add
if (configuration.isDuplex() && du
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60448#action_60448
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
I'm sure that I identified a Latch problem in Multicast Network Discover
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60120#action_60120
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
We are in a full embedded broker configuration.
I attach a part of an o
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric updated AMQ-2774:
--
Attachment: JMAC-BEA-lastlog.log-20100315
A part of a stack trace which shows that "Multicast Discovery Agent Notifie
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60060#action_60060
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
It seems that the "... has been established" trace can only be written i
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60035#action_60035
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
Hi
I looked at MulticastDiscoveryAgent.java source. The "doRecovery" me
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60030#action_60030
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2774:
---
Hi Gary
I understand that more traces are needed. Unfortunately, this h
Network of brokers : Multicast discovery stopped to work
Key: AMQ-2774
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2774
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 5
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58328#action_58328
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2650:
---
Can it be the result of the problem shown in AMQ-1855 ?
> Multicast di
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric updated AMQ-2650:
--
Attachment: Bug Multicast.doc
A word file that contains
the tcpdump trace
a Thread dump of the BEA-tpnocp09v process
Multicast discovery seems to stop to work.
--
Key: AMQ-2650
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2650
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 5.2.0
Environment: A
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=53397#action_53397
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2320:
---
I used Fuse version 5.3.0.4 where the AMQ-2327 problem is corrected.
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=53044#action_53044
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2320:
---
I found the lock. It wasn't a deadlock detected by JVM, but something si
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric updated AMQ-2320:
--
Attachment: screenshot-1.jpg
No deadlock, but ConsumerEventSource is blocked into a shutdown hook.
> Session are not
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=52934#action_52934
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2320:
---
Hi !
I believed I found the major reason of the active threads. But, no
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=52850#action_52850
]
Eric commented on AMQ-2320:
---
Hi !
I didn't make the tests you asked me. But I have some news.
I use
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=52746#action_52746
]
Eric edited comment on AMQ-2320 at 7/8/09 1:40 PM:
---
The schema. All 4 process
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=52746#action_52746
]
Eric edited comment on AMQ-2320 at 7/8/09 1:42 PM:
---
The schema. All 4 process
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=52746#action_52746
]
Eric edited comment on AMQ-2320 at 7/8/09 10:08 AM:
The schema. All 4 proce
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric updated AMQ-2320:
--
Attachment: Pb AMQ Session.JPG
The schema
> Session are not deleted when several processes terminate simultaneously
Session are not deleted when several processes terminate simultaneously in a
"network of broker" complex configuration
--
Key: AMQ-2320
URL: https:
New Multicast discovery agent thread is created for each message
Key: AMQ-2283
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2283
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=49723#action_49723
]
Eric commented on AMQ-1932:
---
For a Huge Project (500 to 1000 servers on 2 different sites), I want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric closed AMQ-1568.
-
Resolution: Fixed
It was a global problem of freeing resources too quickly. Such problem seems to
happen more often, w
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=41204#action_41204
]
Eric commented on AMQ-1568:
---
I would like to close this issue.
I upgraded to 5.0.0 and had the same
Temporary queues, Network of Brokers, Embedded VM
-
Key: AMQ-1568
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1568
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 4.1.0
79 matches
Mail list logo
