[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-306) Provide a means of adding new Transports to the TransportFactory either et runtime or via some other mechanism

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981554#action_12981554 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-306: -- You can append the word "Attribute" to the end

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-304) Allow compression when explicitly instantiating ActiveMQ messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980450#action_12980450 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-304: -- Thanks for the prompt reply guys. It actual

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-304) Allow compression when explicitly instantiating ActiveMQ messages

Allow compression when explicitly instantiating ActiveMQ messages - Key: AMQNET-304 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-304 Project: ActiveMQ .Net Issue Type: Impr

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12973852#action_12973852 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- I can certainly listen for transport interrupt

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12973829#action_12973829 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- Tim I'm currently testing NMS 1.3 for our need

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12973237#action_12973237 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- Tim do you have any idea when you will be able

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972614#action_12972614 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- I can try running the java test case with the

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972149#action_12972149 ] Mark Gellings edited comment on AMQNET-294 at 12/16/10 12:18 PM:

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972149#action_12972149 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- When testing with the older NMS clients all th

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972136#action_12972136 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- Okay. I had thought things were working fine

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971957#action_12971957 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- For completion's sake here is what the broker

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971956#action_12971956 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- I tested this on a Windows XP SP3 machine at h

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971822#action_12971822 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- Oops. Nope. When I uncomment the auto failov

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971809#action_12971809 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- The java test passes. Durable Consumer Failov

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-294: - Attachment: NMSLogLocalFreshCannedActiveMQ542Broker.txt This statement in the log may be of inter

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971790#action_12971790 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- I will try running the java test. FYI, I did

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971767#action_12971767 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- I see this in the ActiveMQ broker log. 2010-1

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-294: - Attachment: NMSLog.txt Tim I've attached a log file with NMS tracing enabled...You can see it get

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971756#action_12971756 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- As far as your confusion...the basic issue is

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971733#action_12971733 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- I was just using your unit test this time with

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971718#action_12971718 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- I experienced problems with it while testing.

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971446#action_12971446 ] Mark Gellings edited comment on AMQNET-294 at 12/14/10 5:31 PM: -

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-294: - Attachment: TimsTestRevisedSlightly.zip > durable subscription message loss when master broker fa

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971446#action_12971446 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- Tim I revised your unit test slightly to get i

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-293) Consumer is not recovered after failover reconnect if connection had been lost in OnMessage (before SendACK)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971093#action_12971093 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-293: -- That is certainly strange. I replicate the be

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970020#action_12970020 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- Yes good catch. I did discover that as well a

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-293) Consumer is not recovered after failover reconnect if connection had been lost in OnMessage (before SendACK)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12969351#action_12969351 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-293: -- Should mention the unit test I was running was

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-293) Consumer is not recovered after failover reconnect if connection had been lost in OnMessage (before SendACK)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-293: - Attachment: CropperCapture[44].jpg CropperCapture[43].jpg CropperC

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-293) Consumer is not recovered after failover reconnect if connection had been lost in OnMessage (before SendACK)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12968921#action_12968921 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-293: -- Testing trunk with ActiveMQ 5.4.2 and there is

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965790#action_12965790 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- Tim I don't develop in Java. What IDE do you

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-294: - Attachment: Apache.NMS.Test (2).zip Updated unit tests. > durable subscription message loss when

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965776#action_12965776 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-294: -- I have tested against tagged 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, an

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-293) Consumer is not recovered after failover reconnect if connection had been lost in OnMessage (before SendACK)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965775#action_12965775 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-293: -- I have tested against tagged 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, an

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-293) Consumer is not recovered after failover reconnect if connection had been lost in OnMessage (before SendACK)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965493#action_12965493 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-293: -- Jan I tested your patch. My unit test in issu

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave --- Key: AMQNET-294 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-294 Project: ActiveMQ .Net Issue Ty

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-294) durable subscription message loss when master broker fails to slave

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-294: - Attachment: Apache.NMS.Test.zip > durable subscription message loss when master broker fails

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-218) NMS session should dispose appropriately if listener delegate still processing message

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=63422#action_63422 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-218: -- Out of curiosity did logic change in regards to

[jira] Created: (AMQ-3027) Message Groups and Group Sequence -1 sending messages in group to multiple consumers

Message Groups and Group Sequence -1 sending messages in group to multiple consumers Key: AMQ-3027 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-3027 Project: A

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-201) WCF binding to support request reply message exchange

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=60017#action_60017 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-201: -- That is because MSMQ is naturally one way, and t

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-252) stress tests not showing all messages being processed as predicted

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-252: - Description: Should say right away the below is the stress test model we used when thoroughl

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-252) stress tests not showing all messages being processed as predicted

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-252: - Description: Should say right away the below is the stress test model we used when thoroughl

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-252) stress tests not showing all messages being processed as predicted

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-252: - Attachment: NativeNMSConsumerAndProducer.zip > stress tests not showing all messages being pr

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-252) stress tests not showing all messages being processed as predicted

stress tests not showing all messages being processed as predicted -- Key: AMQNET-252 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-252 Project: ActiveMQ .Net Issue Type

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-251) System.IO.__Error.EndOfFile() exception

System.IO.__Error.EndOfFile() exception - Key: AMQNET-251 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-251 Project: ActiveMQ .Net Issue Type: Bug Components: ActiveMQ Affects V

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-251) System.IO.__Error.EndOfFile() exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-251: - Attachment: NativeNMSConsumerAndProducer.zip > System.IO.__Error.EndOfFile() exception > --

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-247) Bug in FutureResponse on how handles timeout

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=59100#action_59100 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-247: -- To add. We ended up disabling producer flow con

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-247) Bug in FutureResponse on how handles timeout

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=59099#action_59099 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-247: -- In my opinion I think the implementation should

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1377) amq.js should not have a dependency on prototype.js

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58977#action_58977 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQ-1377: Thanks Dejan. http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-AJAX-P

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1377) amq.js should not have a dependency on prototype.js

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58956#action_58956 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQ-1377: I'd like to use the ajax feature on the client side th

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1377) amq.js should not have a dependency on prototype.js

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58953#action_58953 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQ-1377: Dejan any advice on why I could not get this to work?

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1377) amq.js should not have a dependency on prototype.js

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58914#action_58914 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQ-1377: Hello. I'm trying to get this to work but can't so fa

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (AMQNET-243) failover causes duplicate messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58840#action_58840 ] Mark Gellings edited comment on AMQNET-243 at 4/14/10 3:23 PM: ---

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (AMQNET-243) failover causes duplicate messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58840#action_58840 ] Mark Gellings edited comment on AMQNET-243 at 4/14/10 3:22 PM: ---

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-243) failover causes duplicate messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-243: - Attachment: IdempotentConsumer.zip Attached is sample code on how we implemented an Idempoten

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-236) Property to see if message has actually been sent

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58839#action_58839 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-236: -- This is similar to AMQNET-247 > Property to see

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-247) Bug in FutureResponse on how handles timeout

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58734#action_58734 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-247: -- I've actually looked into this a bit more and th

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-247) Bug in FutureResponse on how handles timeout

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58731#action_58731 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-247: -- I also believe the catch block should rethrow th

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-247) Bug in FutureResponse on how handles timeout

Bug in FutureResponse on how handles timeout Key: AMQNET-247 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-247 Project: ActiveMQ .Net Issue Type: Bug Components: NMS Affects

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-243) failover causes duplicate messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58276#action_58276 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-243: -- Problem is we need it to not happen at all. Whe

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-243) failover causes duplicate messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=58274#action_58274 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-243: -- Same problem with official 1.2.0. We are goin

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-243) failover causes duplicate messages

failover causes duplicate messages -- Key: AMQNET-243 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-243 Project: ActiveMQ .Net Issue Type: Bug Components: NMS Affects Versions: 1.1.0

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-2627) Failover causes duplicate messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQ-2627: --- Attachment: activemq.xml NativeNMSConsumerAndProducer.zip Attached is a console app

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-2627) Failover causes duplicate messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=57840#action_57840 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQ-2627: We have the same problem using NMS and jdbc master/sla

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-218) NMS session should dispose appropriately if listener delegate still processing message

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=57504#action_57504 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-218: -- I tested with a much simpler example and it is w

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-218) NMS session should dispose appropriately if listener delegate still processing message

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=57479#action_57479 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-218: -- I'm expecting to catch a ThreadAbortException in

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-220) Should retry 15 times in between sessions

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=56574#action_56574 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-220: -- Tim we'll retest when RC2 is out. > Should retr

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-226) ?consumer.prefetchSize=X overrides message consumer in pull mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=56476#action_56476 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-226: -- I was expecting no prefetch since the consumer w

[jira] Resolved: (AMQNET-221) Should be able to max out retries on a message and then sent to dead letter queue

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings resolved AMQNET-221. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 Calling ClearBody did the trick. > Should be

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-226) ?consumer.prefetchSize=X overrides message consumer in pull mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-226: - Attachment: NativeNMSConsumerAndProducer.zip sample > ?consumer.prefetchSize=X overrides mes

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-226) ?consumer.prefetchSize=X overrides message consumer in pull mode

?consumer.prefetchSize=X overrides message consumer in pull mode Key: AMQNET-226 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-226 Project: ActiveMQ .Net Issue Type: Te

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-225) Make PrefetchPolicy a property of IConnection for easier unit testing against NMS ActiveMQ

Make PrefetchPolicy a property of IConnection for easier unit testing against NMS ActiveMQ -- Key: AMQNET-225 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-225

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-224) Make RedeliveryPolicy.RedeliveryDelay a virtual method so that it can be overridden

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=56442#action_56442 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-224: -- That could work too. Would just be a bit cleane

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-224) Make RedeliveryPolicy.RedeliveryDelay a virtual method so that it can be overridden

Make RedeliveryPolicy.RedeliveryDelay a virtual method so that it can be overridden --- Key: AMQNET-224 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-224 Project:

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-222) Commands.Message RedeliveryCounter not preserved when creating a new message

Commands.Message RedeliveryCounter not preserved when creating a new message Key: AMQNET-222 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-222 Project: ActiveMQ .Net

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-220) Should retry 15 times in between sessions

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-220: - Attachment: NativeNMSConsumerAndProducer.zip I also noticed the RedeliveryCounter comes throu

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (AMQNET-220) Should retry 15 times in between sessions

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=56400#action_56400 ] Mark Gellings edited comment on AMQNET-220 at 12/11/09 12:21 PM: --

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-221) Should be able to max out retries on a message and then sent to dead letter queue

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=56399#action_56399 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-221: -- I've done some more troubleshooting and the issu

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-221) Should be able to max out retries on a message and then sent to dead letter queue

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=56383#action_56383 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-221: -- This message remaining in the queue is also rede

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-221) Should be able to max out retries on a message and then sent to dead letter queue

Should be able to max out retries on a message and then sent to dead letter queue - Key: AMQNET-221 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-221 Project: Act

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-218) NMS session should dispose appropriately if listener delegate still processing message

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=56379#action_56379 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-218: -- I think behavior should be the same as v1.1. In

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-220) Should retry 15 times in between sessions

Should retry 15 times in between sessions - Key: AMQNET-220 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-220 Project: ActiveMQ .Net Issue Type: Bug Components: NMS Affects Versio

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-219) Setting redelivery options on Message Consumer no longer take affect

Setting redelivery options on Message Consumer no longer take affect Key: AMQNET-219 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-219 Project: ActiveMQ .Net Issue

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-218) NMS session should dispose appropriately if listener delegate still processing message

NMS session should dispose appropriately if listener delegate still processing message -- Key: AMQNET-218 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-218 Pr

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-198) Implement the QueueBrowser functionality in the ActiveMQ provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1#action_1 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-198: -- To get around the lack of functionality we've ju

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-2498) Broker goes down when database is restarted or goes down

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=55549#action_55549 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQ-2498: I have handled this problem using a connection pooler.

[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-208) Add more debug tracing to Consumer/Session Dispose/Close methods

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings updated AMQNET-208: - Attachment: logging.patch > Add more debug tracing to Consumer/Session Dispose/Close methods

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-208) Add more debug tracing to Consumer/Session Dispose/Close methods

Add more debug tracing to Consumer/Session Dispose/Close methods Key: AMQNET-208 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-208 Project: ActiveMQ .Net Issue Type: Im

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-137) Add support for redelivery policy

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=55183#action_55183 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-137: -- That is fine Tim. For now we have it in our own

[jira] Created: (AMQ-2471) Add fine-grained authorization to the web console

Add fine-grained authorization to the web console - Key: AMQ-2471 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2471 Project: ActiveMQ Issue Type: New Feature Components: Broker

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-199) Add support for the Individual Ack type to NMS.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=55080#action_55080 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-199: -- Can we document somewhere what this feature does

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-176) Messages received by a transactional session are not redelivered when the session dies before being commited.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=55061#action_55061 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-176: -- Is this considered stable now? Did you add more

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-159) Make failover protocol optionally asynchronously connect to sockets

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=55031#action_55031 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-159: -- Okay. Thanks Timothy. Last question is whether

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-176) Messages received by a transactional session are not redelivered when the session dies before being commited.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=54982#action_54982 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-176: -- We have a solid test case setup for stress testi

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-194) Async error occurred: javax.jms.JMSException: Unmatched acknowledege when Acknowledgemode of Transactional used

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=54933#action_54933 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-194: -- Okay just wanted to be sure. Thanks for clarify

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-194) Async error occurred: javax.jms.JMSException: Unmatched acknowledege when Acknowledgemode of Transactional used

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=54930#action_54930 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-194: -- Timothy I'm backporting this fix. On rev 815996

[jira] Reopened: (AMQNET-159) Make failover protocol optionally asynchronously connect to sockets

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Gellings reopened AMQNET-159: -- I reviewed the changes and found one difference. In FailoverTrasport.doConnect() if(_asyncCon

[jira] Created: (AMQNET-198) mplement the QueueBrowser functionality in the ActiveMQ provider

mplement the QueueBrowser functionality in the ActiveMQ provider Key: AMQNET-198 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-198 Project: ActiveMQ .Net Issue Type: Ne

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-97) ISession does not contain methods for creating QueueBrowser

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=54879#action_54879 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-97: - This issue is in a fixed state, but should an enhan

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-137) Add support for redelivery policy

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=54878#action_54878 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-137: -- Regarding redelivery policy, currently client ac

[jira] Commented: (AMQNET-176) Messages received by a transactional session are not redelivered when the session dies before being commited.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=54876#action_54876 ] Mark Gellings commented on AMQNET-176: -- I can also confirm this is a problem. When we r

  1   2   >