[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392618#comment-14392618
]
anselme dewavrin commented on AMQ-5082:
---
Well, it depends... When do you think v5.12
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14392950#comment-14392950
]
anselme dewavrin commented on AMQ-5082:
---
Thanks Jim for these precisions.
doing it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14390730#comment-14390730
]
anselme dewavrin commented on AMQ-5082:
---
A big Thank you Jim, we were truly annoyed by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14303376#comment-14303376
]
anselme dewavrin commented on AMQ-5235:
---
yes, the deletion is lazy. Several minutes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14047684#comment-14047684
]
anselme dewavrin commented on AMQ-4987:
---
still up and running in production.
io wait
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14041885#comment-14041885
]
anselme dewavrin commented on AMQ-5082:
---
Dear all,
We had the exact same problem due
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14041890#comment-14041890
]
anselme dewavrin commented on AMQ-5105:
---
I worked for us, thanks
Anselme
leveldb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14041890#comment-14041890
]
anselme dewavrin edited comment on AMQ-5105 at 6/24/14 8:58 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14041885#comment-14041885
]
anselme dewavrin edited comment on AMQ-5082 at 6/24/14 9:03 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14041885#comment-14041885
]
anselme dewavrin edited comment on AMQ-5082 at 6/24/14 9:03 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14038587#comment-14038587
]
anselme dewavrin commented on AMQ-5235:
---
Timothy,
Thank you for your answer and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14038602#comment-14038602
]
anselme dewavrin commented on AMQ-5235:
---
In fact I would greatly appreciate if an
anselme dewavrin created AMQ-5235:
-
Summary: erroneous temp percent used
Key: AMQ-5235
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5235
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
anselme dewavrin updated AMQ-5235:
--
Description:
Dear all,
We have an activemq 5.9 configured with 1GB of tempUsage allowed. Just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
anselme dewavrin resolved AMQ-4987.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.9.0
This fsync impeachment works perfectly.
Anselme
anselme dewavrin created AMQ-5063:
-
Summary: when restarted, slaves do not really sync
Key: AMQ-5063
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5063
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13903946#comment-13903946
]
anselme dewavrin edited comment on AMQ-4987 at 2/18/14 12:54 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13903946#comment-13903946
]
anselme dewavrin edited comment on AMQ-4987 at 2/18/14 12:55 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
anselme dewavrin updated AMQ-5063:
--
Description:
Dear All,
I worked several days on replication tests with 5.9 (and snapshot 5.10),
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
anselme dewavrin updated AMQ-4987:
--
Description:
Dear all,
I set up a 3-nodes replicatedLevelDB activeMQ cluster as explained on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13879805#comment-13879805
]
anselme dewavrin commented on AMQ-4987:
---
Dear All,
The iowait and huge disk activity
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
anselme dewavrin updated AMQ-4987:
--
Description:
Dear all,
I set up a 3-nodes replicatedLevelDB activeMQ cluster as explained on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
anselme dewavrin updated AMQ-4987:
--
Description:
Dear all,
I set up a 3-nodes replicatedLevelDB activeMQ cluster on 3 different
anselme dewavrin created AMQ-4987:
-
Summary: io wait on replicated levelDB slaves
Key: AMQ-4987
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4987
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Test
24 matches
Mail list logo