GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/561
ARTEMIS-322 auto-create/delete JMS topic
Implements a new feature for the broker whereby it may automatically create
and
delete JMS topics which are not explicitly defined through
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/557
The first line of the commit comment should only be 40 characters long as
noted in the Artemis Hacking Guide -
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/docs/hacking-guide/en
Github user jbertram closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/556
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/556
Don't log truststore pass
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternativel
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/927edb76f323885a7855a7c6fddc1e557a004023#commitcomment-17719306
See PR #554
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/554
ARTEMIS-386 fix shebang in service script
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-386
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/927edb76f323885a7855a7c6fddc1e557a004023#commitcomment-17699805
Yes, it should.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/536
ARTEMIS-531 fix war name
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternatively you
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/535
ARTEMIS-532 update JMX RMI port prop
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/532
ARTEMIS-533 & ARTEMIS-531
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternatively
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/531#issuecomment-221057286
Can you provide some context and rationale for this change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/529
Text fixes + CLI improvement
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternatively
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/526#issuecomment-220329595
Apparently org.apache.activemq.artemis.karaf.ArtemisFeatureTest.test
failed. Can you look into this, @dejanb?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/523#issuecomment-220125612
IMO it's a bit verbose for normal test logging, but I can see how it might
be useful for actual traces.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/521
ARTEMIS-523 re-order SASL mechs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-523
Alternatively
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/519
ARTEMIS-522 fix AMQP ANON advert
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-522
Github user jbertram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/517#discussion_r63352943
--- Diff:
artemis-jms-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/management/impl/JMSConnectionFactoryControlImpl.java
---
@@ -432,6
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/513
ARTEMIS-517
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-517
Alternatively you can review and
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/511
Make ScaleDownTest#testStoreAndForward more robust
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/510
Update auto-create/delete tests
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternatively
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/509
Auto-delete JMS, not just core
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternatively
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/508
Improve packet toString() to ease debug
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis packetToString
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/507
Fix InterceptorTest
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternatively you can
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/505
More test fixes
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternatively you can review
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/503
ARTEMIS-512 fix variable name conflict
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/500
ARTEMIS-512 NPEs in LDAP authz
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-512
Alternatively
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/498
ARTEMIS-510 create queue only on route
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-510
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/491
ARTEMIS-459 NPE during RA tearDown
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-459
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/489
ARTEMIS-386 fix shebang
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-386
Alternatively you can
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/473
ARTEMIS-417 more broker-level JMX attrs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-417
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/470
ARTEMIS-489 update examples doc
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-489
Alternatively
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/467
ARTEMIS-400 allow SSL store reload
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-400
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/466#issuecomment-210510297
Local PR check succeeded. I don't know what's going on with the Apache PR
build.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/466
ARTEMIS-407 remove StompConnect references
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-407
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/464
ARTEMIS-405 JMX attributes doc
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-405
Alternatively
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/463#issuecomment-210177993
Looks good. Nice work!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user jbertram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/463#discussion_r59800041
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/replication/ReplicationEndpoint.java
---
@@ -80,13 +80,17 @@
import
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/461
ARTEMIS-420 user switch when broker is service
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-420
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/460
ARTEMIS-476 example fixes/docs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-476
Alternatively
Github user jbertram closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/441
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/441
ARTEMIS-471 NPE during replication
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-471
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/439
ARTEMIS-467 Potential NPE
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-467
Alternatively you
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/433
ARTEMIS-462 JMSXGroupID on JMS 2 producer
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-462
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/427
ARTEMIS-451 JAAS user/role props reload
These are from ActiveMQ 5.x, specifically
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6214 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5876.
You
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/426
ARTEMIS-445 avoid NPE on null ks password
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-445
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/423#issuecomment-197934280
I ran the PR build locally and it was successful. I'm not sure what's
going on with the automated one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/423
ARTEMIS-441 correct time-unit for large msg poll
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/420
ARTEMIS-432 client gets msg after session stop
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-432
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/410
ARTEMIS-385 clean-up factory on timeout
This restores a call to ClientSessionFactory#cleanup that appears to have
been
mistakenly removed by a previous change related to this JIRA
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/406
ARTEMIS-422 support appendRollbackRecord
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-422
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/400
ARTEMIS-350 fix for potential race
It's possible for the latch used for flow control here to get out of sync.
In
other words, multiple count-downs can occur between count-ups so
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/392
ARTEMIS-391 log WARN on cxn limit
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-391
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/391
ARTEMIS-399 support 'clientId' activation prop
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis A
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/384
ARTEMIS-395 auto-delete only if setting is true
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/381#issuecomment-181617040
@clebertsuconic, yes. That's precisely the use-case I was targeting. Note
the test-case I added tests this explicitly.
---
If your project is set u
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/381#issuecomment-181611986
@clebertsuconic, can you elaborate a bit more on that use-case? I'm not
following. To what does a NettyAcceptor connect?
---
If your project is set u
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/381
ARTEMIS-388 listen for activation failures
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-388
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/375#issuecomment-181462442
Can you rebase this so the PR build will kick-off again? I'm not sure why
it failed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/373
ARTEMIS-387 grammar fix
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-387
Alternatively you can
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/372
ARTEMIS-376 NPE during fail-back
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-376
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/369#issuecomment-179587849
@clebertsuconic, I certainly think it's possible. However, I haven't dug
into that issue much as I've been working on other tasks so I can&
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/362#issuecomment-178061415
I'm not following. From what I can tell in addHead() (where I need to do
the check) Rreference.getScheduledDeliveryTime() will always return 0 so
there
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/362#issuecomment-178012905
I need some way to differentiate messages that are put on the head of the
queue by the scheduler and those that aren't because they need to be tr
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/362
ARTEMIS-374 support schedule messages on LVQ
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis LVQ2
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/358
Fix broken LVQ example
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternatively you can
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/350#issuecomment-175378662
Nice work, @clebertsuconic. Glad we squashed this bug.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/346#issuecomment-174735323
Not sure why this was reported as failed. Everything looks good to me:
https://builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ-Artemis-PR-Build/962/console.
---
If your
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/346
ARTEMIS-358 topic mistakenly removed with sub
The problem here is that the management notification listener was mistakenly
removing the topic itself instead of just the non-durable
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/346#issuecomment-174705757
I think @howardgao should take a look at this before it's merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/336#issuecomment-173968186
Checkstyle failure:
[ERROR]
src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/selector/filter/ComparisonExpression.java[94:13]
(blocks) RightCurly
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/335
ARTEMIS-354 set login.config for Win service
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/332
Fix JMS queue doc
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternatively you can
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/328
ARTEMIS-352 security example readme fix
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-352
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/325
Ldap event listener + 'stop' command fix
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ldapEve
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/318
ARTEMIS-336 Windows script updates
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/309
ARTEMIS-336 don't hard-code instance path
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/297
ARTEMIS-333 Redistribution + groups tests failing
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/296
ARTEMIS-218 auto-create in cluster
I'm not 100% certain this is the problem described on ARTEMIS-218, but I
did find a problem with auto-creating JMS queues in a cluster and
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/294
fix security doc
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternatively you can review
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/293
ARTEMIS-331 support 0-length large msg
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-331
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/292
ARTEMIS-177 create/destroy subscription race
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-177
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/245#issuecomment-159054551
The scenario you outline (X addresses with Y max-size-bytes and Z heap-size
that would require N addresses to go into paging mode before an OOME occurs) is
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/245#issuecomment-159003967
Even though they have monitoring in place to avoid the OOME, the OOME is
still possible if something were to malfunction with regards to the monitoring.
I
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/208#issuecomment-157844491
@themerius, I'm not sure if @clebertsuconic is done with the test changes,
but in any case you can add @jscheid as a git remote and cherry-pick his c
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/221#issuecomment-151905257
Two questions:
1) Is there a particular reason for this upgrade aside from simply keeping
up with the latest release?
2) Can you link to the
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/204
ARTEMIS-256 orchestrate failback deterministically
The failback process needs to be deterministic rather than relying on
various
incarnations of Thread.sleep() at crucial points
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/195
ARTEMIS-255 make non-blocking-failover-timeout configurable
Use the callFailoverTimeout for both blocking and non-blocking calls.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/194
ARTEMIS-254 don't throw j.l.ISE from producer
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMI
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/188
ARTEMIS-74 import JAAS auth from 5.x
This change allows the use of JAAS login modules for basic authentication
and authorization.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/186#issuecomment-146000651
Would probably be worth squashing all the commits down to one as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/185#issuecomment-145614212
I'm not sure I understand why it's necessary to change over 3,000 files
just to demonstrate an OpenWire exception. Can you clarify this point?
-
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/184
Clarify HTTP(S) upgrade config
Demonstrate that the Artemis acceptor receiving HTTP(S) upgrade connections
doesn't need any SSL configuration.
You can merge this pull request i
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/171
ARTEMIS-225 validate clientID is set for durable sub
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/170
ARTEMIS-224 add logmanager to example classpaths
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/169
Count references for RA connection factories
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis raFix
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/150
ARTEMIS-211 Memory leak using wildcard topic
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-211
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/147
ARTEMIS-206 HTTP Upgrade does not work over HTTPS
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/140
ARTEMIS-212 Unable to parse IPv6 address
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-212
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/133
ARTEMIS-210 outbound RA connection load-balancing
Inbound sessions are always created from the same ActiveMQConnectionFactory
which means the load-balancing policy is applied to them
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/130
Couple of fixes
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Alternatively you can review
901 - 1000 of 1085 matches
Mail list logo
