+1
Regards
JB
On 01/05/2015 07:27 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days.
I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow overlooked.
Any objection to rename?
Hadrian
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Thank you Hadrian.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Renaming-trunk-to-master-tp4689494p4691265.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I created the master branch myself.
INFRA-9111 is still open. I don't have the karma to remove the 'trunk'
branch. Please use 'master' from now on. Let's follow the commits to
trunk and merge them to master, make sure nothing gets lost.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 02/03/2015 04:14 PM, Hadrian
Per agreement in this thread, now that 5.11.0 is out, I sent a request
to infra [1] to rename trunk to master.
Please keep an eye on it so you don't loose work.
Cheers,
Hadrian
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9111
On 01/06/2015 07:58 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
+1
Maybe we
+1, master is the norm, no matter which Git workflow you use.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days.
I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow overlooked. Any
objection to rename?
+1 for the rename.
Using master is typical and this is definitely a change now made by
infra during migrations, based on experience of migrating a couple of
things into Git repos at Qpid recently.
On 5 January 2015 at 18:27, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a bit confusing, a
+1
Maybe we should wait with the rename until we have 5.11.0 released (there’s
some work involved like reconfiguring jenkins and stuff, so it'll delay
release)
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in
I don't really know the conventions of git, but are the branches still
called branches, or are they servants? Trunk/branches is a consistent
metaphor. Master/branches is mixing metaphors.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015, 1:52 PM Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On 01/05/2015 01:27 PM, Hadrian
AFAIK there is no distinction between trunk and branches in GIT. One of the
branches just happens to be called master.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Jim Gomes e.se...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't really know the conventions of git, but are the branches still
called branches, or are they
+1
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days.
I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow overlooked. Any
objection to rename?
Hadrian
--
Claus Ibsen
-
Red Hat, Inc.
It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days.
I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow overlooked.
Any objection to rename?
Hadrian
+1 for doing the rename.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days.
I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow overlooked. Any
objection to rename?
Hadrian
--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering |
12 matches
Mail list logo
