> Unless of course it's written up as a proper example with a proper readme
>> > with context and is appropriately named like all the other examples.
>> What
>> > I don't want to do is confuse users by having integration tests mixed in
>> > with examples aimed
ests mixed in
> > with examples aimed for end users. It's just going to cause confusion.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:24 AM, nigro_franz
> wrote:
> >
> > > Agree! It is a good idea indeed!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
d users. It's just going to cause confusion.
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:24 AM, nigro_franz wrote:
>
> > Agree! It is a good idea indeed!
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> > nabble.com/DISC
n't want to do is confuse users by having integration tests mixed in
> with examples aimed for end users. It's just going to cause confusion.
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:24 AM, nigro_franz wrote:
>
> > Agree! It is a good idea indeed!
> >
> >
> >
>
in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Smoke-tests-tp4724485p4724492.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Agree! It is a good idea indeed!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Smoke-tests-tp4724485p4724492.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It should still be part of the release. It's a valid test anyoene can run.
We just make it clear.
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:32 AM Martyn Taylor wrote:
> Good idea Clebert. We probably don't want to include these smoke tests as
> part of the release, so can you ensure you don't include it in
Good idea Clebert. We probably don't want to include these smoke tests as
part of the release, so can you ensure you don't include it in the examples
pom :)
Cheers
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:56 AM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> We always had the examples on Artemis playing a double thingy... being
>
We always had the examples on Artemis playing a double thingy... being
both an educational and documentational resource, and that has also
saved us a few times from making changes that would invalidate
configurations and the manual.
However, to replicate ARTEMIS-1089 now, I couldn't easily produc
