Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/196
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/196#issuecomment-86735537
The references to HornetMQ probably weren't caught earlier because nobody
thought to search for HornetMQ since the broker's name is HornetQ (without
the M).
Github user davsclaus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/196#issuecomment-86727631
There were 2 left over comments about hornetmq in the activemq6 source
code. Now a git grep returns empty
```
davsclaus:~/workspace/activemq-6 (polish)/$
GitHub user davsclaus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/196
Polish and renamed hornetmq to activemq-6
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/davsclaus/activemq-6 polish
Alternatively you
Github user HornetQBot commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/196#issuecomment-86727658
Can one of the admins verify this patch by saying ok to test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/196#issuecomment-86749202
I contributed that check style I wrote to check style. They refactored it
and I'm waiting to be released on their satellite project before I can remove
this
