Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/724
@bayern39 if you actually agree with my change, you can probably close this
one.
Take a look at #730 and if you agree please close this one.
Also please review
Github user bayern39 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/724
OK,I will do it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/724
I have sent another PR: #730
Can you take a look please? Please close this one when that one is merged.
I'm not adding your example as I don't see much val
Github user bayern39 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/724
In fact,I think the no seed Random is better than it has.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user bayern39 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/724
@jbertram Hi Justin,I have try another way fixed it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/724
I'm not sure I agree with this change since it will impact existing
load-balancing semantics which users may depend on. Connection load-balancing
is done per connection factory. Connecti
