[GitHub] franz1981 commented on issue #2524: ARTEMIS-2240 ActiveMQThreadPoolExecutor should use LinkedTransferQueue

2019-01-28 Thread GitBox
franz1981 commented on issue #2524: ARTEMIS-2240 ActiveMQThreadPoolExecutor should use LinkedTransferQueue URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2524#issuecomment-458042571 @michaelandrepearce I'm very happy (I hope that perf are nice as well), because it makes much more

[GitHub] franz1981 commented on issue #2524: ARTEMIS-2240 ActiveMQThreadPoolExecutor should use LinkedTransferQueue

2019-01-28 Thread GitBox
franz1981 commented on issue #2524: ARTEMIS-2240 ActiveMQThreadPoolExecutor should use LinkedTransferQueue URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2524#issuecomment-458041944 @michaelandrepearce nice catch!! you've already measured with your box how the last version is

[GitHub] franz1981 commented on issue #2524: ARTEMIS-2240 ActiveMQThreadPoolExecutor should use LinkedTransferQueue

2019-01-28 Thread GitBox
franz1981 commented on issue #2524: ARTEMIS-2240 ActiveMQThreadPoolExecutor should use LinkedTransferQueue URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2524#issuecomment-458038880 Thanks @michaelandrepearce to have looked into this, I will change it accordingly to the last comment

[GitHub] franz1981 commented on issue #2524: ARTEMIS-2240 ActiveMQThreadPoolExecutor should use LinkedTransferQueue

2019-01-26 Thread GitBox
franz1981 commented on issue #2524: ARTEMIS-2240 ActiveMQThreadPoolExecutor should use LinkedTransferQueue URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2524#issuecomment-457884911 @michaelandrepearce @clebertsuconic If any of these commits will improve scalability

[GitHub] franz1981 commented on issue #2524: ARTEMIS-2240 ActiveMQThreadPoolExecutor should use LinkedTransferQueue

2019-01-26 Thread GitBox
franz1981 commented on issue #2524: ARTEMIS-2240 ActiveMQThreadPoolExecutor should use LinkedTransferQueue URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2524#issuecomment-457884054 On my box I'm getting the same performance of the master version for single producer/single consumer