a bit late to respond but this seems fine to me, +1
On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 12:54 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a consensus. So I will process creating a Jira and preparing a PR.
>
> Thanks all for your feedback.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 9:01 AM
Hi,
We have a consensus. So I will process creating a Jira and preparing a PR.
Thanks all for your feedback.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 9:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ distribution.
>
> However, we still have
+1
El jue, 4 ago 2022 a las 7:32, Matt Pavlovich ()
escribió:
> +1 in favor of less dependencies in the bistro
>
> > On Aug 4, 2022, at 2:01 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ
> distribution.
> >
> > However, we
+1 in favor of less dependencies in the bistro
> On Aug 4, 2022, at 2:01 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ distribution.
>
> However, we still have references to Camel in ActiveMQ distribution
> (in the conf example, in
+1
Jon
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 8:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ distribution.
>
> However, we still have references to Camel in ActiveMQ distribution
> (in the conf example, in the shipped libraries, ...).
>
> For
+1
Justin
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 2:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ distribution.
>
> However, we still have references to Camel in ActiveMQ distribution
> (in the conf example, in the shipped libraries, ...).
>
> For
Yes of course.
That sounds a good opportunity to clean remaining links to Camel
Le jeu. 4 août 2022, 10:21, Francois Papon a
écrit :
> Hi JB,
>
> Agree, make sense.
>
> regards,
>
> François
>
> On 04/08/2022 09:01, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We already removed the
Hi JB,
Agree, make sense.
regards,
François
On 04/08/2022 09:01, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi,
We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ distribution.
However, we still have references to Camel in ActiveMQ distribution
(in the conf example, in the shipped libraries,
Hi,
We already removed the activemq-camel component from ActiveMQ distribution.
However, we still have references to Camel in ActiveMQ distribution
(in the conf example, in the shipped libraries, ...).
For ActiveMQ 5.18.x, I propose to completely remove any reference to Camel.
No objection ?