I removed you from the list, Arun.
Justin
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:45 AM arun rapaka wrote:
> Can someone please remove me from this group
>
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 7:57 PM, Bruce Snyder
> wrote:
>
> > Good question, Chris. I don't believe so and I agree allowing discussions
> > in PRs is
Can someone please remove me from this group
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 7:57 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> Good question, Chris. I don't believe so and I agree allowing discussions
> in PRs is critical.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 7:40 AM Christopher Shannon <
>
I definitely agree with starting a new [DISCUSS] thread about GitHub
Discussions.
Justin
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:11 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> We should start a new thread about Discussions so it can be clearly
> and specifically discussed..i.e not on this thread or the other
> previous
We should start a new thread about Discussions so it can be clearly
and specifically discussed..i.e not on this thread or the other
previous thread both originally about Issues.
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 16:32, Christopher Shannon
wrote:
>
> I think overall it would be a positive thing, it gives a
I think overall it would be a positive thing, it gives a place for people
to ask questions without having to raise a Jira.
I guess the one downside is it would be something else to monitor...there's
already Jira, Slack, and the mailing lists.
I think one thing that would be helpful for
Enabling GitHub Discussions is not something we've really discussed
thoroughly. I mentioned it in my review only briefly as a "future
consideration." I don't think we've got consensus yet.
Justin
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 8:47 AM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is
This isnt about discussions in PRs, it is about enabling the
Discussions tab in a github repository. Basically a threaded forum
style view where people can...discuss :)
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 15:27, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> Good question, Chris. I don't believe so and I agree allowing discussions
We need a clear agreement specifically about enabling Discussions and
on which repositories, since Infra will have to enable it for us on
them, Discussions is not self-service.
Might be simplest to just start a thread, and then when its clear,
either start a vote or do a lazy consensus statement
Good question, Chris. I don't believe so and I agree allowing discussions
in PRs is critical.
Bruce
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 7:40 AM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there anything stopping us from enabling Github Discussions for now? It
> seems like we had
Is there anything stopping us from enabling Github Discussions for now? It
seems like we had consensus on that part.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 2:15 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> Robbie/JB-
>
> Good calls outs, thanks! I did not mean to skew into contribution guide as
> far as I did. I will take a
Robbie/JB-
Good calls outs, thanks! I did not mean to skew into contribution guide as far
as I did. I will take a pass at cleaning up.
Thanks,
Matt
> On Apr 16, 2024, at 11:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> The security bits are also detailed in all the repositories already by
> default at
The security bits are also detailed in all the repositories already by
default at the org level, e.g
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/?tab=security-ov-file (or
repositories can define their own policy, e.g
https://github.com/apache/activemq/?tab=security-ov-file#readme ).
Though we can
Hi Matt
Imho, we are mixing two topics here:
1. The ticket management system
2. The contribution guide
So, let me try to clarify:
[PROPOSAL]
I'm in favor of GH Issues, but we don't yet have a strong consensus
about that. I would propose a new thread about that to give a chance
to anyone to
I'm not really going to add much in this thread that I didnt already
in the other thread, especially given I'd prefer to stick to JIRA as
it is...though on one specific point below, that wasnt mentioned in
the other thread that I recall...
"Update-3. Provide a link for users to submit a CLA"
@dev-
I appreciate all the good feedback and discussion. A number of good points,
suggestions and perspectives. Overall, I see an uptick in community interest in
contributing to ActiveMQ and that’s a great thing! I believe that modernizing
the toolkit, reducing contribution friction and
15 matches
Mail list logo
