+1 (non binding)
I will fix the Karaf/Equinox related issue for the next release.
Regards
JB
On 06/05/2014 04:08 PM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the 5.10.0 release. This
release has
232 bug fixes and improvements.
Could you review the
Hi,
I started to work on it, I will keep you posted later today.
Regards
JB
On 06/08/2014 12:35 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
I think, one of the Karaf experts should look at this if this is really
an ActiveMQ issue. I'm not a Karaf expert but I feel this is rather an
issue of Karaf Equinox
On Jun 11, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of adding a comment to each jira ticket about the commit. You
can get JIRA to link to it automatic when you click the source sub
tab.
But that requires AFAIR to tell JIRA to do that, and where the source
code
I reopened the issue and mark it for 5.11. I don’t think this issue is a
blocker for this release. Having said that, the vote was open for 5 days
with not -1s, so I’ll close it now and continue with the release.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part
I didn't really get an answer to my earlier post regarding AMQ-5174.
Can that be included in ActiveMQ 5.10 too?
Thanks,
Paul
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote:
I reopened the issue and mark it for 5.11. I don’t think this issue is a
blocker for this
Hi Paul,
it’s a new feature request and there’s no work being done on it, so it’s
not something that should block the release. If you can create a patch for
this, it’d speed up the inclusion of it for the future. Contributions are
always more than welcomed.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
Thanks Dejan and Tim - I agree this jira entry should not hold up the
release.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-0-Release-Candidate-2-tp4681721p4681994.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1 (non-binding)
I was hoping to briefly review all of the jira entires, but only managed
about 50 of them. I will try to do more - as life permits.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-0-Release-Candidate-2-tp4681721p4681995.html
Hi Arthur
Instead of adding a comment to each jira ticket about the commit. You
can get JIRA to link to it automatic when you click the source sub
tab.
But that requires AFAIR to tell JIRA to do that, and where the source
code is. Maybe INFRA can help with that.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:04 AM,
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the 5.10.0 release. This
release has
232 bug fixes and improvements.
Could you review the artifacts and vote?
The list of resolved issues is here:
+1
Hadrian
On Thursday 05 June 2014 10:08:15 Dejan Bosanac wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the 5.10.0 release. This
release has
232 bug fixes and improvements.
Could you review the artifacts and vote?
The list of resolved issues is here:
+1
On 5 June 2014 15:08, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the 5.10.0 release. This
release has
232 bug fixes and improvements.
Could you review the artifacts and vote?
The list of resolved issues is here:
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the 5.10.0 release. This
release has
232 bug fixes and improvements.
Could you review the artifacts and vote?
The list of resolved issues is here:
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the 5.10.0 release. This
release has
232 bug fixes and improvements.
Could you review the artifacts and vote?
The list of resolved issues is here:
+1
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Jim Gomes jgo...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the 5.10.0 release. This
release has
232 bug fixes and improvements.
Could
Everyone voting +1 -- what about the concern with AMQ-4277?
Especially Claus who marked it as RESOLVED.
Please help me to get this cleared up.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-0-Release-Candidate-2-tp4681721p4681924.html
Sent
On 06/09/2014 08:20 PM, artnaseef wrote:
Everyone voting +1 -- what about the concern with AMQ-4277?
Especially Claus who marked it as RESOLVED.
Please help me to get this cleared up.
--
View this message in context:
+1
On 06/05/2014 10:08 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the 5.10.0 release. This
release has
232 bug fixes and improvements.
Could you review the artifacts and vote?
The list of resolved issues is here:
Thank you for the clarification. I have re-opened AMQ-4794 and removed the
fixed-in tag for 5.10.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-0-Release-Candidate-2-tp4681721p4681843.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at
BTW, ignore my activity on AMQ-4958; I mistakenly re-openend it due to
missing the update while browsing the wrong git branch.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-0-Release-Candidate-2-tp4681721p4681847.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ -
Hmm, what is RESOLVED -- LATER? Sounds like a way to forget about a
ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4277
If this has not been fixed and the intent is to look at it later,
shouldn't it be re-opened and not marked as resolved in 5.10?
--
View this message in context:
I think, one of the Karaf experts should look at this if this is really
an ActiveMQ issue. I'm not a Karaf expert but I feel this is rather an
issue of Karaf Equinox and installation of ActiveMQ only triggers this
problem.
On 07.06.2014 20:30, artnaseef wrote:
Thank you for the clarification.
Hi
I gave the camel trunk source code a test with this RC and it is working fine.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the 5.10.0 release. This
release has
232 bug fixes and improvements.
Could you
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the 5.10.0 release. This
release has
232 bug fixes and improvements.
Could you review the artifacts and vote?
The list of resolved issues is here:
Can someone familiar with AMQ-4269 put a quick comment there as to why it was
marked invalid? Was it a case of the original post didn't expose a bug,
but rather just known undesirable, but correct operation?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4269
AMQ-4794 is marked won't fix -- due to
The web console installs now with no problem on Karaf.
Best regards
Krzysztof
On 05.06.2014 16:08, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just cut a second release candidate for the 5.10.0 release. This
release has
232 bug fixes and improvements.
Could you review the artifacts and vote?
Great - any concerns with changing the resolution on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4794 to FIXED?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-0-Release-Candidate-2-tp4681721p4681742.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list
The problem still exists (tested with Karaf 2.3.4, Camel 2.13.1 and
ActiveMQ 5.10.0)
On 05.06.2014 23:00, artnaseef wrote:
Great - any concerns with changing the resolution on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4794 to FIXED?
--
View this message in context:
Did I misread the earlier statement that it works, or did something change?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-0-Release-Candidate-2-tp4681721p4681747.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
AMQ-5167 works now -- Karaf with Felix. With Equinox (AMQ-4794) does not work
and adding the missing import doesn't help too,
On 05.06.2014 23:54, artnaseef wrote:
Did I misread the earlier statement that it works, or did something change?
--
View this message in context:
30 matches
Mail list logo
