Result of the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.18.0 release vote.
Vote passes with 9 Votes (5 Bindings, 4 Non Bindings)
Binding:
Clebert Suconic
Christopher Shannon
Michael Pearce
Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Justin Bertram
Non Binding:
Robbie Gemmel
Francesco Nigro
Etiene Hossack
Howard Gao
Thank you to
(Non-binding)
[X] +1 approve this release
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Got a happy build on my end!
> On Aug 12, 2021, at 7:57 AM, Francesco Nigro wrote:
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments
+1 (non-binding)
Il giorno gio 12 ago 2021 alle ore 16:53 Justin Bertram
ha scritto:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:54 PM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.18.0 release
> >
> > This is a substantial release involving
+1 (binding)
Justin
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:54 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.18.0 release
>
> This is a substantial release involving good work from a lot of great
> people. Thank you and congratulations to all involved in achieving the
>
+1
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:37 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> Yep, Clebert noted this in his initial reply yesterday and updated the
> template, and committed the change to the release guide to avoid
> further occurrences.
>
> (I would just have deleted the whole section though personally rather
Yep, Clebert noted this in his initial reply yesterday and updated the
template, and committed the change to the release guide to avoid
further occurrences.
(I would just have deleted the whole section though personally rather
than just removing the version, since the response format is implicit
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 19:45, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.18.0 release
>
> This is a substantial release involving good work from a lot of great
> people. Thank you and congratulations to all involved in achieving the
> current state on the
+1 (binding)
On 10 August 2021 at 6:47, Howard Gao wrote:
+1
Howard
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 3:03 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
Just updating what I did to verify the release before I gave my +1
- Made sure the packaged bytes are what I meant after releasing
- done some tests after
+1 (binding)
Just a quick note: the vote section of the email mention 2.4.0, but we
are actually voting on 2.18.0.
Not a big deal ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 09/08/2021 20:50, Clebert Suconic wrote:
Just wanted to record my +1.
and update the voting template from previous vote (sorry for
+1
Howard
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 3:03 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Just updating what I did to verify the release before I gave my +1
>
>
> - Made sure the packaged bytes are what I meant after releasing
> - done some tests after downloads
> - Run the full testsuite with a 100% pass for a few
Just updating what I did to verify the release before I gave my +1
- Made sure the packaged bytes are what I meant after releasing
- done some tests after downloads
- Run the full testsuite with a 100% pass for a few times before tagging 2.18.0
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:50 PM Clebert Suconic
Just wanted to record my +1.
and update the voting template from previous vote (sorry for the copy
& paste error):
[X] +1 approve this release
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:45 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.18.0 release
This is a substantial release involving good work from a lot of great
people. Thank you and congratulations to all involved in achieving the
current state on the codebase.
The following features were added as part of this release:
13 matches
Mail list logo
