Re: ActiveMQ : Integration of C.

2016-04-25 Thread vikd
APR1.3 and higher version. or if any other alternative to compile ActiveMQ CPP library . -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Integration-of-C-tp4709951p4711135.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveMQ : Integration of C.

2016-04-23 Thread Timothy Bish
context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Integration-of-C-tp4709951p4711124.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Tim Bish twitter: @tabish121 blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Re: ActiveMQ : Integration of C.

2016-04-23 Thread vikd
9 automake : automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6 libtool : ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18 22:14:06) Thanks in advanced ! -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Integration-of-C-tp4709951p4711124.html Sent from the Acti

Re: ActiveMQ : Integration of C.

2016-04-08 Thread artnaseef
Can you provide details of the problems seen? I haven't used ActiveMQ-CPP myself in a while, but I would expect building it from sources on any modern Linux system to work. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Integration-of-C-tp4709951p4710530

Re: ActiveMQ : Integration of C.

2016-04-06 Thread vikd
so that I can download and check whether CMS libraries are compatible with linux (Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.9 (Tikanga)) or not ? Please guide .. Thanks in advance !! -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Integration-of-C

Re: ActiveMQ : Integration of C.

2016-03-30 Thread vikd
thank your for your reply ! -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Integration-of-C-tp4709951p4710046.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveMQ : Integration of C.

2016-03-27 Thread artnaseef
that the ActiveMQ-CPP library is good solution in my experience, so going with a native Java application may be overkill. Hope this helps. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Integration-of-C-tp4709951p4709976.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

ActiveMQ : Integration of C.

2016-03-25 Thread vikd
functions and why? 2) if we go above 2nd (B) point Java & C using JNI then will any performance issue or concurrency issue to call shared c library (.so library) from Java? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Integration-of-C-tp4709951.html Sent from