Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-16 Thread Arthur Naseef
Thank you Arjun for the response and your consideration. I appreciate it. If you want to discuss particular concerns in the activemq-cpp code directly, I can be reached via DM on the ASF slack. Or you can email me directly. I look forward to finding a good outcome for activemq-cpp and C++ acces

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-14 Thread Arjun Ray
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:28:10 -0700, Arthur Naseef wrote: | I'm trying to use CLion to work on the activemq-cpp sources, and | finding it is only partially working. The main thing that's missing | is navigating symbols - for example, "find usages" and navigating | from a base class to sub class

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-13 Thread Arjun Ray
TOn Thu, 13 Feb 2025 20:29:12 -0700, Arthur Naseef wrote: Hello Art, I freely apologize for my sardonic and curmudgeonly style. I come from the rough and tumble of a bygone age - I'm well into my fourth decade on the internet, and I'll age myself further by revealing that I've been on Medicare

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-13 Thread Arthur Naseef
*MAJOR TANGENT WARNING* (you have been warned) I'm going to interrupt the constructive part of this discussion for a moment. There's something important here that needs to be addressed - it keeps knawing at me. First, let me repeat one of my most favorite sayings of all time - "hate never ends h

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-13 Thread Arjun Ray
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:31:26 -0600, Justin Bertram wrote: | > Are there links explaining the role (capabilities, responsibilities, etc)? | | This is a good place to start [1]. To be clear, this is just an idea | at this point. Thanks very much! I have some reading to do. :-) | Apache is more

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-13 Thread Arjun Ray
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 14:12:25 -0700, Arthur Naseef wrote: | Looking at AMQCPP-628 , | yeah - I get it. After offering some effort and the ticket gets closed | with "won't fix" and no comments - that's discouraging. Even a comment to the effect "a

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-13 Thread Justin Bertram
> Are there links explaining the role (capabilities, responsibilities, etc)? This is a good place to start [1]. To be clear, this is just an idea at this point. > Microsoft still maintains a modicum of MS-DOS comaptibility! I'm not sure that's a particularly valid comparison. Microsoft is a larg

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-13 Thread Arthur Naseef
There's a lot here. I'll try to hit a couple of key points. First off, while it would be awesome (in my opinion) to have active C++ developers on the project to maintain activemq-cpp (or a replacement), there is a process to becoming a committer that is important to follow. I wanted to mention t

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-13 Thread Arjun Ray
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:20:22 -0600, Justin Bertram wrote: | Rather than forking I think it would potentially make more sense for | you to become a committer here at Apache. I have no idea what I would be signing up for! Are there links explaining the role (capabilities, responsibilities, etc)?

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-13 Thread Justin Bertram
Rather than forking I think it would potentially make more sense for you to become a committer here at Apache. Then updates could take place in stages. I think the first step would just involve getting things working on C++17. Larger changes would come later. Changes to the public API would require

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-12 Thread Arjun Ray
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:39:19 -0700, Arthur Naseef wrote: | It would be great to have some attention on this project, if folks | are still using it in practice. I'm sure there are more than a few, but the number is likely to dwindle for lack of support. | With that said, as with all opensource,

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-12 Thread Arthur Naseef
Hey Arjun - glad to see the interest in activemq-cpp. It would be great to have some attention on this project, if folks are still using it in practice. We are always interested in having individuals interested in projects to contribute. With that said, as with all opensource, there is no dedica

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-11 Thread Arjun Ray
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:28:10 -0700, Arthur Naseef wrote: | I'm trying to use CLion to work on the activemq-cpp sources, and finding it | is only partially working. The main thing that's missing is navigating | symbols - for example, "find usages" and navigating from a base class to | sub class me

Re: CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-11 Thread Christopher Shannon
I don't have any experience using CLion (I haven't worked with C++ for many years). Have you tried using vscode? It works with Linux and is open source and may work better, I'm not sure. On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 11:28 AM Arthur Naseef wrote: > I'm trying to use CLion to work on the activemq-cpp so

CLion with activemq-cpp

2025-02-07 Thread Arthur Naseef
I'm trying to use CLion to work on the activemq-cpp sources, and finding it is only partially working. The main thing that's missing is navigating symbols - for example, "find usages" and navigating from a base class to sub class methods just isn't working at all. Looking for the Intellij equival