That sounds like a good plan. Agree with Claus on not targetting 5.10.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Compiling-with-Java-8-tp4680938p4680980.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
sounds good to me.
On 6 May 2014 20:41, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> I took a stab at trying to compile ActiveMQ /w Java 8 and quickly ran
> into problems /w Scala. Upgrading to Scala 2.11 seems to resolve the
> problem.
>
> Any objections to moving up to Scala 2.11?
>
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Enginee
Sounds good to me.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> I took a st
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> I took a stab at trying to compile ActiveMQ /w Java 8 and quickly ran
> into problems /w Scala. Upgrading to Scala 2.11 seems to resolve the
> problem.
>
> Any objections to moving up to Scala 2.11?
>
Yes I would favor waiting with this for
I took a stab at trying to compile ActiveMQ /w Java 8 and quickly ran
into problems /w Scala. Upgrading to Scala 2.11 seems to resolve the
problem.
Any objections to moving up to Scala 2.11?
--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: h
