Hiram Chirino writes:
> I generally like the suggestions. The one thing I worry about is that
> I think folks might like to put the APOLLO_HOME/bin in their path, and
> if that's the case I'd only want apollo to show up on the PATH. We
> probably want to put those new support scripts in a dif
Hi Lionel,
I generally like the suggestions. The one thing I worry about is that
I think folks might like to put the APOLLO_HOME/bin in their path, and
if that's the case I'd only want apollo to show up on the PATH. We
probably want to put those new support scripts in a different location
under
Hiram,
I'm experimenting with rpm packaging of Apollo and I have a few suggestions
regarding the three scripts currently in use (apollo, apollo-broker and
apollo-broker-service).
First, apollo-broker-service contains some code that may evolve (see
AMQ-3317 ;-) and should IMHO be located under APO
