I am pleased to announce the release of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console
1.0.0
Downloads are available at :
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis-console/download/
Release Notes can be found at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARTEMIS/versions/12354639
This is the first
is synced I will update the website and send the
> announcement.
>
> Andy
I reviewed your website update PR
https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/144 for adding the
component/release. I have now pushed the changes along with various
fixups and small improvements in a followup.
There
is synced I will update the website and send the
> announcement.
>
> Andy
I created a matching subdir in the dist release area at
release/activemq/activemq-artemis-console and copied in the 1.0.0
dir/files from the dev area.
It should
I have a problem starting it ActiveMQ Web Console 6.1.2 Uses: Gradle,
ActiveMQ Web Console 6.1.2 + Jetty 11.0.2 + SpringBoot 3.3.4 server Jetty
started I can't run the page http://localhost:8169/admin the page returns:
HTTP ERROR 404 Not Found
@SpringBootApplication
public class JettyS
t; > Great work!!! The only thing that I miss from the old console is the
>> update
>> > of the url in the address bar of the browser.
>> >
>> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 11:26, Andy Taylor
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I would like to propo
The vote passed with 4 Binding +1 votes and 1 non-binding +1 vote.
The following votes were received:
Binding:
Clebert Suconic
Domenico Francesco Bruscino
Timothy Bish
Robbie Gemmell
Non-binding:
Andy Taylor
Thanks everybody for taking the time on this release, for all the
contributions and th
SHOT broker instance.
> >
> > Great work!!! The only thing that I miss from the old console is the
> update
> > of the url in the address bar of the browser.
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 11:26, Andy Taylor wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to propose
dalone, connecting it
> remotely to a latest 2.38.0-SNAPSHOT broker instance.
>
> Great work!!! The only thing that I miss from the old console is the update
> of the url in the address bar of the browser.
>
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 11:26, Andy Taylor wrote:
>
> > I would li
For what it's worth, I answered this same question on the ActiveMQ users
mailing list about an hour ago. It was posted to both the users and dev
lists simultaneously leading to a bit of confusion.
Also, it's worth noting that #1 will only work if ActiveMQ Classic supports
the protocol u
Hi Balint-
Yes, you can migrate Artemis to ActiveMQ Classic. There are a couple
approaches:
1. Naturally drain the Artemis brokers using application consumers, and then
cut-over to ActiveMQ Classic brokers. In this scenario, there are no messages
to migrate, since the applications have
Hi,
I'm writing this email regarding the ActiveMQ Artemis Migration, specifically
the KahaDB Export Tool.
When I tried to migrate my ActiveMQ Classic broker to Artemis, I found that the
KahaDB Export Tool is a Linux tool, but my environment is on Windows and
couldn't execute
the url in the address bar of the browser.
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 11:26, Andy Taylor wrote:
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release.
> This is RC3.
>
> This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira
>
> [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgr
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.6 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.18.x series, bringing:
- fixes on the STOMP protocol
- fix on KahaDB (on the recovery files)
- improvements on the WebConsole (e.g. cache control policy)
- dependency up
On 10/2/24 05:25, Andy Taylor wrote:
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release.
This is RC3.
This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira
[ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4
The release notes can be found here:
https
I plan on doing a release next week so if anybody has any issues they want
to get resolved before then either send your PRs or comment on the PRs if
they already exist.
Justin
a and website.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 7:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee.
>
> This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially:
> - fixes on the
he console standalone, connecting it
remotely to a pure 2.37.0 broker instance.
- I tried the modified-2.37.0 integration from the draft PR
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/5245
- I used the modified-2.37.0 to upgrade the pure-2.37.0 broker instance.
- I diffed the archive
ropose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release.
> This is RC3.
>
> This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira
>
> [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4
>
> The release notes can be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release.
This is RC3.
This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira
[ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4
The release notes can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARTEMIS
Regards
JB
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 7:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee.
>
> This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially:
> - fixes on the STOMP
I raised https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-console/pull/34 to
address the missing license file in the source release archive, and
improve the rat plugin config to allow simple manual verifications.
On Mon, 30 Sept 2024 at 17:41, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> -1
>
> Overall i
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee.
>
> This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially:
> - fixes on the STOMP protocol
> - fix on KahaDB (on the recovery files)
> - improvement on the webconsole (e.g. cache control policy)
> -
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks!
regards,
François
fpa...@apache.org
francois.pa...@openobject.fr
Le 29/09/2024 à 07:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
Hi folks,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee.
This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially:
- fixes
Thanks Robbie, I will re build and tag a new release
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 11:22, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> I raised https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-console/pull/34 to
> address the missing license file in the source release archive, and
> improve the rat plugin config to all
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 7:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee.
>
> This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially:
> - fixes on the STOMP protocol
>
archive and exercised the web console
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 11:06 PM Aleksei Zotov
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (nb)
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Aleksei Zotov.
> > >
> >
>
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 2:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee.
> > >
> > > This release includes fixes and dependency
un, Sep 29, 2024 at 11:06 PM Aleksei Zotov wrote:
> +1 (nb)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Aleksei Zotov.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 2:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.
e draft PR
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/5245. I noticed some
issues with that, all on the main artemis repo side, which I pushed
some commits to resolve some of and commented on the rest. With the
fixes I made in place, I also tried running the upgrade command from
the branch to
+1 (nb)
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Aleksei Zotov.
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 2:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee.
>
> This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially:
> - fixes on the STOM
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 3:46 PM Andy Taylor wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release.
>
> This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira
>
> [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to us
Hi folks,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee.
This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially:
- fixes on the STOMP protocol
- fix on KahaDB (on the recovery files)
- improvement on the webconsole (e.g. cache control policy)
- dependency updates (spring
+1 Binding..
I ran the broker with the new console.. and it's a lot superior...
very smooth.. nice job andy!
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 9:47 AM Andy Taylor wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release.
>
> This is the 1st release of the Ac
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release.
This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira
[ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4
The release notes can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARTEMIS/versions
FYI
-- Forwarded message -
From: Harry Kumar
Date: Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 11:30 AM
Subject: Remote Position - "ActiveMQ Administrator"
Hello,
I believe you are having a good day today,
Please have the below position and let me know if interested and available?
Please
NB: this PR https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1156 is not
correct as it's breaking tests. I'm fixing before merging in order to
move forward on the 5.18.6 release.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 7:52 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
> Hi JB-
>
> New release sounds go
; On Sep 13, 2024, at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I would like to share an update/summary plan about releases (as we had
> > messages on the mailing list):
> > - ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.4 is in preparation (almost ready, I should be
&g
ike to share an update/summary plan about releases (as we had
> messages on the mailing list):
> - ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.4 is in preparation (almost ready, I should be
> able to submit the release to vote on Monday max)
> - ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.4 is also in preparation. I would like to
>
Hi folks,
I would like to share an update/summary plan about releases (as we had
messages on the mailing list):
- ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.4 is in preparation (almost ready, I should be
able to submit the release to vote on Monday max)
- ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.4 is also in preparation. I would like to
Hi Aleksei
I’m working on last issues right now. I think I should be able to submit
5.18.6 to vote tomorrow.
Regards
JB
Le jeu. 12 sept. 2024 à 05:33, Aleksei Zotov a écrit :
> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>
> Thanks for the prompt response! Having 5.18.6 released soon would be great!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bes
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Thanks for the prompt response! Having 5.18.6 released soon would be great!
Thanks,
Best Regards,
Aleksei Zotov.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 12:01 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you can see on the table here:
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/downloa
I am pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0
Downloads are now available at:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/
For a complete list of updates:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.37.0
There's
, 2024 at 10:26 AM Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> Built from source. Ran a few tests. Looks good!
>
> +1
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 10:19 AM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release.
> >
Built from source. Ran a few tests. Looks good!
+1
Justin
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 10:19 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release.
>
> I would like to highlight:
>
> - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 and
+1
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:14 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release.
>
> I would like to highlight:
>
> - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 and 2.32.0:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ART
Thanks Robbie, I have dropped the release, I will add a binary distribution
to fix this when I return from vacation
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 16:01, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 at 12:50, Andy Taylor wrote:
> >
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemi
On 8/16/24 11:11, Clebert Suconic wrote:
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release.
I would like to highlight:
- We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 and 2.32.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4986
- We introduced profiles
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 at 12:50, Andy Taylor wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release.
>
> This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira
>
> [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4
>
> The release
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 at 16:11, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release.
>
> I would like to highlight:
>
> - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 and 2.32.0:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
Just a correction, here is the correct Maven Staging repository URI:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1404
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:11 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release.
>
> I w
this is to officially record by +1 Binding vote
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:11 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release.
>
> I would like to highlight:
>
> - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 a
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release.
I would like to highlight:
- We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 and 2.32.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4986
- We introduced profiles differentiating the broker execution from
tools on the CLI
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:33 PM Clebert Suconic
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > This is Just to record my +1 binding officially..
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:32 PM Clebert Suconic
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would li
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release.
This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira
[ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4
The release notes can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARTEMIS/versions
ecord my +1 binding officially..
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:32 PM Clebert Suconic
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release.
> > >
> > > I would like to highlight:
> > >
> > > -
cancel it.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:33 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> This is Just to record my +1 binding officially..
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:32 PM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release.
> >
&
This is Just to record my +1 binding officially..
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:32 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release.
>
> I would like to highlight:
>
> - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 a
I hadn't check your response, but I went with 2.37.0... Vote just sent
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 11:05 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> I hadn't checked my emails and only just saw this.
>
> I merged https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/5136 earlier
> for https
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release.
I would like to highlight:
- We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 and 2.32.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4986
- We introduced profiles differentiating the broker execution from
tools on the CLI
I hadn't checked my emails and only just saw this.
I merged https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/5136 earlier
for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4785 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4702. Those changes are
not really appropriate for a 2.36.1. I&#
I would like to do a release tomorrow, so I would address this issue,
which is a compatibility issue introduced after 2.30.0..Users may do a
rolling upgrade between 2.30.0 and latest versions, and this would not
work properly unless the following is addressed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release.
It's maintenance release on the 6.1.x series, bringing:
- add a BoM
- fixes on the Message REST API, especially concurrent access
- Spring 6.1.11 update
- fix NoClassDefFound on bin/activemq export command
vote!
Regards
JB
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 8:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 16 fixes and updates, especially:
> - add a BoM
> - fixes on the Message REST API,
I think removing it is a good idea and dont expect removing it now
would actually be a big issue, however given it has been there for so
long I also dont see that it urgently needs to go away now. Anyone
that doesnt want it there already has simple ways to prevent it being
there, so I'd probably ju
I think we're arguing different points here.
I agree with basically everything you're saying. Is it a waste? Yes. Is
there anybody who actually uses it? Probably not (although we don't know
for sure). Can folks change their stuff to adjust if necessary? Almost
certainly. All things being equal, sh
I think it's a total waste of resources to keep adding hornetq after 9
years since Artemis 1.0.0 release. We are making *everybody* to have a
default hornetq acceptor for the hypothetical one user that is still
using it and keeps upgrading every release we make. So, that's a total
inexistent case..
It seems pretty black & white to me. Forcing application clients to change
their code or configuration for an upgrade is the definition of a breaking
change. Forcing admins to change their commands or scripts to get the same
configuration as before is also a breaking change. Am I missing something?
@Justin Bertram I will agree to disagree with you on that one :)
If we stick with that policy, we wouldn't be able to do anything.. we
have the versions.adoc for that particular reason... and we always
have specific instructions in there.
the 61616 acceptor will still accept hornetQ connections,
As far as I can tell, the fact that one would need to change what one was
doing previously to get the same behavior technically makes this a
"breaking change." We really don't know how folks are using the "create"
command and how that relates to their migration or upgrade processes. Also,
the fact
+1 on deprecating HornetQ protocol and having it off by default
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 at 16:02, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> it's not a breaking change.. they can always do :
>
> ./artemis create --enable-hornetq-adapter...
>
> that will only affect new servers... new configurations created from
> now
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/camel/camel-bom/4.7.0/camel-bom-4.7.0.pom
> > >
> > > See Spring:
> > >
> > >
> > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-framework-bom/6.1.11/spring-framework-bom-6.1.11.pom
> > >
>
it's not a breaking change.. they can always do :
./artemis create --enable-hornetq-adapter...
that will only affect new servers... new configurations created from
now on will not have hornetQ. if you migrate a previous configuration
with upgrade, it will still be there.
it's been 37 versions s
Generally speaking I agree, but I'm not sure we can make that change in a
minor release since it changed the default behavior and it's not
technically a bug. Maybe wait until 3.0?
Justin
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:01 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I just realized we still create the following acce
I just realized we still create the following acceptor on every server we start:
tcp://0.0.0.0:5445?anycastPrefix=jms.queue.;multicastPrefix=jms.topic.;protocols=HORNETQ,STOMP;useEpoll=truehttps://activemq.apache.org/contact
> >
> > -Matt Pavlovich
> >
> > > On Aug 2, 2024, at 1:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote.
> > >
> > >
aven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-framework-bom/6.1.11/spring-framework-bom-6.1.11.pom
>
> -Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Aug 2, 2024, at 1:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to yo
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
Le ven. 2 août 2024 à 07:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes 16 fixes and updates, especially:
> - add a BoM
> - fixes on the Message REST API,
+1 (non-binding)
Tested with some internal projects.
Thanks for the release!
regards,
François
On 02/08/2024 08:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi everyone,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote.
This release includes 16 fixes and updates, especially:
- add a BoM
en't had any
> issue to note, everything works fine. I also did some research and there's
> really nothing I can find that says it is bad practice. As long as the
> ActiveMQ parent pom is available it should work as the version is hard
> coded for that.
>
> I've
You’re having some basic communication problems here.
First. Why use the vote thread to ask a question about this.
Second: it seems you’re mixing the file NIo channel with the Netty NIO
channel. You didn’t state what is the problem and how your fix is
achieving to fix the issue you saw. I tr
My understanding is that there is a technical reason Spring and Camel moved to
hard-coded version numbers in their bom’s. Since many ActiveMQ projects also
use Spring and/or Camel, I believe this is an important technical reason to
understand and adopt for ActiveMQ’s bom.
I also understand
repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-framework-bom/6.1.11/spring-framework-bom-6.1.11.pom
>
> -Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Aug 2, 2024, at 1:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3
Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote.
> >
> > This release includes 16 fixes and updates, especially:
> > - add a BoM
> > - fixes on the Message REST API, especially concurr
#x27;t think we need to change the BOM with how it is
currently constructed.
I have used ${project.version} before in my own BOMs and I haven't had any
issue to note, everything works fine. I also did some research and there's
really nothing I can find that says it is bad practice. As long
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 5:33 AM Koteswararao Gundapaneni <
> apache.tomcat.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > HI Team,
> >
> > Please find the nio channel improvement for active mq
> >
> > Please post if any queries
> >
> > Thanks & Regards
>
> >
>
/maven2/org/springframework/spring-framework-bom/6.1.11/spring-framework-bom-6.1.11.pom
-Matt Pavlovich
> On Aug 2, 2024, at 1:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes
>>
>>
>>
>> How do we improve the stability of NIO channel
>>
>> Let me come up with design document
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, 05:31 Clebert Suconic,
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ A
ronique provient d’un expéditeur externe. Ne
> cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne pouvez pas
> confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain que le
> contenu ne présente aucun risque.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
hannel
>
> Let me come up with design document
>
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, 05:31 Clebert Suconic,
> wrote:
>
>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release.
>>
>>
>> I would like to highlight the following:
>>
>>
e le
contenu ne présente aucun risque.
Hi everyone,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote.
This release includes 16 fixes and updates, especially:
- add a BoM
- fixes on the Message REST API, especially concurrent access
- Spring 6.1.11 update
- fix NoClassDefFound
Hi Team
How do we improve the stability of NIO channel
Let me come up with design document
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, 05:31 Clebert Suconic,
wrote:
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release.
>
>
> I would like to highlight the following:
>
> * N
Hi everyone,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote.
This release includes 16 fixes and updates, especially:
- add a BoM
- fixes on the Message REST API, especially concurrent access
- Spring 6.1.11 update
- fix NoClassDefFound on bin/activemq export command line
- several
I'm pleased to announce the release of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release
Downloads are now available at:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/
For a complete list of updates:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.36.0
I would
upload everything and send the announcement when everything is synced up.
thanks again
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:00 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release.
>
>
> I would like to highlight the following:
>
>
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 01:01, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release.
>
>
> I would like to highlight the following:
>
> * Numerous dependency upgrades triggered by integration with GitHub's
> Dependabot.
>
On 7/25/24 20:00, Clebert Suconic wrote:
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release.
I would like to highlight the following:
* Numerous dependency upgrades triggered by integration with GitHub's
Dependabot.
* Stability improvement for use-cases involving slow
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 2:00 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release.
>
>
> I would like to highlight the following:
>
> * Numerous dependency upgrades triggered by integration with
ally record my +1 binding record
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:00 PM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release.
> >
> >
> > I would like to highlight the following:
> >
> > * Numero
this is to officially record my +1 binding record
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:00 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release.
>
>
> I would like to highlight the following:
>
> * Numerous dependency upgrades triggered by inte
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release.
I would like to highlight the following:
* Numerous dependency upgrades triggered by integration with GitHub's
Dependabot.
* Stability improvement for use-cases involving slower IO devices
(e.g. NFS) and the NIO journa
1 - 100 of 8375 matches
Mail list logo
