[ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 released

2024-10-09 Thread Andy Taylor
I am pleased to announce the release of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 Downloads are available at : https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis-console/download/ Release Notes can be found at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARTEMIS/versions/12354639 This is the first

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-09 Thread Robbie Gemmell
is synced I will update the website and send the > announcement. > > Andy I reviewed your website update PR https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/144 for adding the component/release. I have now pushed the changes along with various fixups and small improvements in a followup. There

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-08 Thread Robbie Gemmell
is synced I will update the website and send the > announcement. > > Andy I created a matching subdir in the dist release area at release/activemq/activemq-artemis-console and copied in the 1.0.0 dir/files from the dev area. It should

ActiveMQ Web Console 6.1.2 + Jetty 11.0.2 + SpringBoot 3.3.4

2024-10-08 Thread Piotr Pabian
I have a problem starting it ActiveMQ Web Console 6.1.2 Uses: Gradle, ActiveMQ Web Console 6.1.2 + Jetty 11.0.2 + SpringBoot 3.3.4 server Jetty started I can't run the page http://localhost:8169/admin the page returns: HTTP ERROR 404 Not Found @SpringBootApplication public class JettyS

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-08 Thread Andy Taylor
t; > Great work!!! The only thing that I miss from the old console is the >> update >> > of the url in the address bar of the browser. >> > >> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 11:26, Andy Taylor >> wrote: >> > >> > > I would like to propo

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-08 Thread Andy Taylor
The vote passed with 4 Binding +1 votes and 1 non-binding +1 vote. The following votes were received: Binding: Clebert Suconic Domenico Francesco Bruscino Timothy Bish Robbie Gemmell Non-binding: Andy Taylor Thanks everybody for taking the time on this release, for all the contributions and th

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-08 Thread Andy Taylor
SHOT broker instance. > > > > Great work!!! The only thing that I miss from the old console is the > update > > of the url in the address bar of the browser. > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 11:26, Andy Taylor wrote: > > > > > I would like to propose

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
dalone, connecting it > remotely to a latest 2.38.0-SNAPSHOT broker instance. > > Great work!!! The only thing that I miss from the old console is the update > of the url in the address bar of the browser. > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 11:26, Andy Taylor wrote: > > > I would li

Re: ActiveMQ KahaDB Export Tool

2024-10-07 Thread Justin Bertram
For what it's worth, I answered this same question on the ActiveMQ users mailing list about an hour ago. It was posted to both the users and dev lists simultaneously leading to a bit of confusion. Also, it's worth noting that #1 will only work if ActiveMQ Classic supports the protocol u

Re: ActiveMQ KahaDB Export Tool

2024-10-07 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Balint- Yes, you can migrate Artemis to ActiveMQ Classic. There are a couple approaches: 1. Naturally drain the Artemis brokers using application consumers, and then cut-over to ActiveMQ Classic brokers. In this scenario, there are no messages to migrate, since the applications have

ActiveMQ KahaDB Export Tool

2024-10-07 Thread Nagy, Balint, Dr. (AHA/FP-1)
Hi, I'm writing this email regarding the ActiveMQ Artemis Migration, specifically the KahaDB Export Tool. When I tried to migrate my ActiveMQ Classic broker to Artemis, I found that the KahaDB Export Tool is a Linux tool, but my environment is on Windows and couldn't execute

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-04 Thread Domenico Francesco Bruscino
the url in the address bar of the browser. On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 11:26, Andy Taylor wrote: > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release. > This is RC3. > > This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira > > [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgr

[ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.6 has been released!

2024-10-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.6 release. It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.18.x series, bringing: - fixes on the STOMP protocol - fix on KahaDB (on the recovery files) - improvements on the WebConsole (e.g. cache control policy) - dependency up

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-02 Thread Timothy Bish
On 10/2/24 05:25, Andy Taylor wrote: I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release. This is RC3. This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4 The release notes can be found here: https

[HEADS UP] ActiveMQ Artemis release next week

2024-10-02 Thread Justin Bertram
I plan on doing a release next week so if anybody has any issues they want to get resolved before then either send your PRs or comment on the PRs if they already exist. Justin

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release

2024-10-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
a and website. Thanks all for your vote! Regards JB On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 7:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee. > > This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially: > - fixes on the

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-02 Thread Robbie Gemmell
he console standalone, connecting it remotely to a pure 2.37.0 broker instance. - I tried the modified-2.37.0 integration from the draft PR https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/5245 - I used the modified-2.37.0 to upgrade the pure-2.37.0 broker instance. - I diffed the archive

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-02 Thread Robbie Gemmell
ropose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release. > This is RC3. > > This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira > > [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4 > > The release notes can be found here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-02 Thread Andy Taylor
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release. This is RC3. This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4 The release notes can be found here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARTEMIS

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release

2024-10-01 Thread Liao, Ken
Regards JB On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 7:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee. > > This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially: > - fixes on the STOMP

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-01 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I raised https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-console/pull/34 to address the missing license file in the source release archive, and improve the rat plugin config to allow simple manual verifications. On Mon, 30 Sept 2024 at 17:41, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > -1 > > Overall i

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release

2024-10-01 Thread Matt Pavlovich
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee. > > This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially: > - fixes on the STOMP protocol > - fix on KahaDB (on the recovery files) > - improvement on the webconsole (e.g. cache control policy) > -

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release

2024-10-01 Thread Francois Papon
+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, François fpa...@apache.org francois.pa...@openobject.fr Le 29/09/2024 à 07:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : Hi folks, I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee. This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially: - fixes

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-10-01 Thread Andy Taylor
Thanks Robbie, I will re build and tag a new release On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 11:22, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > I raised https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-console/pull/34 to > address the missing license file in the source release archive, and > improve the rat plugin config to all

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release

2024-09-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 7:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee. > > This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially: > - fixes on the STOMP protocol >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release

2024-09-30 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
archive and exercised the web console > > > > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 11:06 PM Aleksei Zotov > wrote: > > > > > +1 (nb) > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Aleksei Zotov. > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release

2024-09-30 Thread Jamie G.
> > > > > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 2:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee. > > > > > > This release includes fixes and dependency

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release

2024-09-30 Thread Christopher Shannon
un, Sep 29, 2024 at 11:06 PM Aleksei Zotov wrote: > +1 (nb) > > Thanks! > > Best Regards, > > Aleksei Zotov. > > > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 2:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-09-30 Thread Robbie Gemmell
e draft PR https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/5245. I noticed some issues with that, all on the main artemis repo side, which I pushed some commits to resolve some of and commented on the rest. With the fixes I made in place, I also tried running the upgrade command from the branch to

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release

2024-09-29 Thread Aleksei Zotov
+1 (nb) Thanks! Best Regards, Aleksei Zotov. On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 2:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi folks, > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee. > > This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially: > - fixes on the STOM

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-09-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 3:46 PM Andy Taylor wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release. > > This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira > > [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to us

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release

2024-09-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi folks, I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee. This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially: - fixes on the STOMP protocol - fix on KahaDB (on the recovery files) - improvement on the webconsole (e.g. cache control policy) - dependency updates (spring

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-09-27 Thread Clebert Suconic
+1 Binding.. I ran the broker with the new console.. and it's a lot superior... very smooth.. nice job andy! On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 9:47 AM Andy Taylor wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release. > > This is the 1st release of the Ac

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-09-23 Thread Andy Taylor
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release. This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4 The release notes can be found here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARTEMIS/versions

Fwd: Remote Position - "ActiveMQ Administrator"

2024-09-16 Thread Bruce Snyder
FYI -- Forwarded message - From: Harry Kumar Date: Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 11:30 AM Subject: Remote Position - "ActiveMQ Administrator" Hello, I believe you are having a good day today, Please have the below position and let me know if interested and available? Please

Re: [HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6, 6.1.4, 6.2.0 releases plan

2024-09-16 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
NB: this PR https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1156 is not correct as it's breaking tests. I'm fixing before merging in order to move forward on the 5.18.6 release. Regards JB On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 7:52 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote: > > Hi JB- > > New release sounds go

Re: [HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6, 6.1.4, 6.2.0 releases plan

2024-09-16 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
; On Sep 13, 2024, at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I would like to share an update/summary plan about releases (as we had > > messages on the mailing list): > > - ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.4 is in preparation (almost ready, I should be &g

Re: [HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6, 6.1.4, 6.2.0 releases plan

2024-09-13 Thread Matt Pavlovich
ike to share an update/summary plan about releases (as we had > messages on the mailing list): > - ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.4 is in preparation (almost ready, I should be > able to submit the release to vote on Monday max) > - ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.4 is also in preparation. I would like to >

[HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6, 6.1.4, 6.2.0 releases plan

2024-09-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi folks, I would like to share an update/summary plan about releases (as we had messages on the mailing list): - ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.4 is in preparation (almost ready, I should be able to submit the release to vote on Monday max) - ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.4 is also in preparation. I would like to

Re: Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" Release Dates - AMQ-8398

2024-09-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Aleksei I’m working on last issues right now. I think I should be able to submit 5.18.6 to vote tomorrow. Regards JB Le jeu. 12 sept. 2024 à 05:33, Aleksei Zotov a écrit : > Hi Jean-Baptiste, > > Thanks for the prompt response! Having 5.18.6 released soon would be great! > > Thanks, > > Bes

Re: Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" Release Dates - AMQ-8398

2024-09-11 Thread Aleksei Zotov
Hi Jean-Baptiste, Thanks for the prompt response! Having 5.18.6 released soon would be great! Thanks, Best Regards, Aleksei Zotov. On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 12:01 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > As you can see on the table here: > https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/downloa

[ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 Released

2024-08-21 Thread Clebert Suconic
I am pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 Downloads are now available at: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/ For a complete list of updates: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.37.0 There's

[RESULT] [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 (CR2)

2024-08-21 Thread Clebert Suconic
, 2024 at 10:26 AM Justin Bertram wrote: > > Built from source. Ran a few tests. Looks good! > > +1 > > > Justin > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 10:19 AM Clebert Suconic > wrote: > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release. > >

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 (CR2)

2024-08-21 Thread Justin Bertram
Built from source. Ran a few tests. Looks good! +1 Justin On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 10:19 AM Clebert Suconic wrote: > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release. > > I would like to highlight: > > - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 and

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 (CR2)

2024-08-21 Thread Howard Gao
+1 On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:14 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release. > > I would like to highlight: > > - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 and 2.32.0: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ART

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-08-20 Thread Andy Taylor
Thanks Robbie, I have dropped the release, I will add a binary distribution to fix this when I return from vacation On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 16:01, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 at 12:50, Andy Taylor wrote: > > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemi

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 (CR2)

2024-08-19 Thread Timothy Bish
On 8/16/24 11:11, Clebert Suconic wrote: I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release. I would like to highlight: - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 and 2.32.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4986 - We introduced profiles

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-08-19 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 at 12:50, Andy Taylor wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release. > > This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira > > [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4 > > The release

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 (CR2)

2024-08-19 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 at 16:11, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release. > > I would like to highlight: > > - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 and 2.32.0: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 (CR2)

2024-08-16 Thread Clebert Suconic
Just a correction, here is the correct Maven Staging repository URI: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1404 On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:11 AM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release. > > I w

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 (CR2)

2024-08-16 Thread Clebert Suconic
this is to officially record by +1 Binding vote On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:11 AM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release. > > I would like to highlight: > > - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 a

[VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 (CR2)

2024-08-16 Thread Clebert Suconic
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release. I would like to highlight: - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 and 2.32.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4986 - We introduced profiles differentiating the broker execution from tools on the CLI

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0

2024-08-15 Thread Clebert Suconic
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:33 PM Clebert Suconic > > wrote: > > > > > > This is Just to record my +1 binding officially.. > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:32 PM Clebert Suconic > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I would li

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0

2024-08-15 Thread Andy Taylor
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release. This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4 The release notes can be found here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARTEMIS/versions

[CANCEL] [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0

2024-08-14 Thread Clebert Suconic
ecord my +1 binding officially.. > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:32 PM Clebert Suconic > > wrote: > > > > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release. > > > > > > I would like to highlight: > > > > > > -

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0

2024-08-14 Thread Clebert Suconic
cancel it. On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:33 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > This is Just to record my +1 binding officially.. > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:32 PM Clebert Suconic > wrote: > > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release. > > &

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0

2024-08-14 Thread Clebert Suconic
This is Just to record my +1 binding officially.. On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:32 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release. > > I would like to highlight: > > - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 a

Re: HEADS-UP ActiveMQ Artemis release

2024-08-14 Thread Clebert Suconic
I hadn't check your response, but I went with 2.37.0... Vote just sent On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 11:05 AM Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > I hadn't checked my emails and only just saw this. > > I merged https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/5136 earlier > for https

[VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0

2024-08-14 Thread Clebert Suconic
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.37.0 release. I would like to highlight: - We fixed an issue with compatibility between 2.31.1 and 2.32.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4986 - We introduced profiles differentiating the broker execution from tools on the CLI

Re: HEADS-UP ActiveMQ Artemis release

2024-08-14 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I hadn't checked my emails and only just saw this. I merged https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/5136 earlier for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4785 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4702. Those changes are not really appropriate for a 2.36.1. I&#

HEADS-UP ActiveMQ Artemis release

2024-08-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
I would like to do a release tomorrow, so I would address this issue, which is a compatibility issue introduced after 2.30.0..Users may do a rolling upgrade between 2.30.0 and latest versions, and this would not work properly unless the following is addressed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

[ANN] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 has been released!

2024-08-08 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release. It's maintenance release on the 6.1.x series, bringing: - add a BoM - fixes on the Message REST API, especially concurrent access - Spring 6.1.11 update - fix NoClassDefFound on bin/activemq export command

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-08 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
vote! Regards JB On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 8:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote. > > This release includes 16 fixes and updates, especially: > - add a BoM > - fixes on the Message REST API,

Re: [DISCUSS] HornetQ Acceptor on default acceptor for ActiveMQ Artemis

2024-08-07 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I think removing it is a good idea and dont expect removing it now would actually be a big issue, however given it has been there for so long I also dont see that it urgently needs to go away now. Anyone that doesnt want it there already has simple ways to prevent it being there, so I'd probably ju

Re: [DISCUSS] HornetQ Acceptor on default acceptor for ActiveMQ Artemis

2024-08-07 Thread Justin Bertram
I think we're arguing different points here. I agree with basically everything you're saying. Is it a waste? Yes. Is there anybody who actually uses it? Probably not (although we don't know for sure). Can folks change their stuff to adjust if necessary? Almost certainly. All things being equal, sh

Re: [DISCUSS] HornetQ Acceptor on default acceptor for ActiveMQ Artemis

2024-08-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
I think it's a total waste of resources to keep adding hornetq after 9 years since Artemis 1.0.0 release. We are making *everybody* to have a default hornetq acceptor for the hypothetical one user that is still using it and keeps upgrading every release we make. So, that's a total inexistent case..

Re: [DISCUSS] HornetQ Acceptor on default acceptor for ActiveMQ Artemis

2024-08-07 Thread Justin Bertram
It seems pretty black & white to me. Forcing application clients to change their code or configuration for an upgrade is the definition of a breaking change. Forcing admins to change their commands or scripts to get the same configuration as before is also a breaking change. Am I missing something?

Re: [DISCUSS] HornetQ Acceptor on default acceptor for ActiveMQ Artemis

2024-08-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
@Justin Bertram I will agree to disagree with you on that one :) If we stick with that policy, we wouldn't be able to do anything.. we have the versions.adoc for that particular reason... and we always have specific instructions in there. the 61616 acceptor will still accept hornetQ connections,

Re: [DISCUSS] HornetQ Acceptor on default acceptor for ActiveMQ Artemis

2024-08-07 Thread Justin Bertram
As far as I can tell, the fact that one would need to change what one was doing previously to get the same behavior technically makes this a "breaking change." We really don't know how folks are using the "create" command and how that relates to their migration or upgrade processes. Also, the fact

Re: [DISCUSS] HornetQ Acceptor on default acceptor for ActiveMQ Artemis

2024-08-07 Thread Domenico Francesco Bruscino
+1 on deprecating HornetQ protocol and having it off by default On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 at 16:02, Clebert Suconic wrote: > it's not a breaking change.. they can always do : > > ./artemis create --enable-hornetq-adapter... > > that will only affect new servers... new configurations created from > now

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/camel/camel-bom/4.7.0/camel-bom-4.7.0.pom > > > > > > See Spring: > > > > > > > > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-framework-bom/6.1.11/spring-framework-bom-6.1.11.pom > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] HornetQ Acceptor on default acceptor for ActiveMQ Artemis

2024-08-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
it's not a breaking change.. they can always do : ./artemis create --enable-hornetq-adapter... that will only affect new servers... new configurations created from now on will not have hornetQ. if you migrate a previous configuration with upgrade, it will still be there. it's been 37 versions s

Re: [DISCUSS] HornetQ Acceptor on default acceptor for ActiveMQ Artemis

2024-08-07 Thread Justin Bertram
Generally speaking I agree, but I'm not sure we can make that change in a minor release since it changed the default behavior and it's not technically a bug. Maybe wait until 3.0? Justin On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:01 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > I just realized we still create the following acce

[DISCUSS] HornetQ Acceptor on default acceptor for ActiveMQ Artemis

2024-08-06 Thread Clebert Suconic
I just realized we still create the following acceptor on every server we start: tcp://0.0.0.0:5445?anycastPrefix=jms.queue.;multicastPrefix=jms.topic.;protocols=HORNETQ,STOMP;useEpoll=truehttps://activemq.apache.org/contact

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-06 Thread Christopher Shannon
> > > > -Matt Pavlovich > > > > > On Aug 2, 2024, at 1:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote. > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-05 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
aven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-framework-bom/6.1.11/spring-framework-bom-6.1.11.pom > > -Matt Pavlovich > > > On Aug 2, 2024, at 1:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to yo

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-05 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB Le ven. 2 août 2024 à 07:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote. > > This release includes 16 fixes and updates, especially: > - add a BoM > - fixes on the Message REST API,

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-05 Thread Francois Papon
+1 (non-binding) Tested with some internal projects. Thanks for the release! regards, François On 02/08/2024 08:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi everyone, I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote. This release includes 16 fixes and updates, especially: - add a BoM

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-05 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
en't had any > issue to note, everything works fine. I also did some research and there's > really nothing I can find that says it is bad practice. As long as the > ActiveMQ parent pom is available it should work as the version is hard > coded for that. > > I've

Re: [VOTE]Apache ActiveMQ Artemis mq channel improvement for speed and reliability of the mq message

2024-08-04 Thread Clebert Suconic
You’re having some basic communication problems here. First. Why use the vote thread to ask a question about this. Second: it seems you’re mixing the file NIo channel with the Netty NIO channel. You didn’t state what is the problem and how your fix is achieving to fix the issue you saw. I tr

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-04 Thread Matt Pavlovich
My understanding is that there is a technical reason Spring and Camel moved to hard-coded version numbers in their bom’s. Since many ActiveMQ projects also use Spring and/or Camel, I believe this is an important technical reason to understand and adopt for ActiveMQ’s bom. I also understand

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-framework-bom/6.1.11/spring-framework-bom-6.1.11.pom > > -Matt Pavlovich > > > On Aug 2, 2024, at 1:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-04 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote. > > > > This release includes 16 fixes and updates, especially: > > - add a BoM > > - fixes on the Message REST API, especially concurr

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-04 Thread Christopher Shannon
#x27;t think we need to change the BOM with how it is currently constructed. I have used ${project.version} before in my own BOMs and I haven't had any issue to note, everything works fine. I also did some research and there's really nothing I can find that says it is bad practice. As long

Re: [VOTE]Apache ActiveMQ Artemis mq channel improvement for speed and reliability of the mq message

2024-08-03 Thread Koteswararao Gundapaneni
> > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 5:33 AM Koteswararao Gundapaneni < > apache.tomcat.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > HI Team, > > > > Please find the nio channel improvement for active mq > > > > Please post if any queries > > > > Thanks & Regards > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-03 Thread Matt Pavlovich
/maven2/org/springframework/spring-framework-bom/6.1.11/spring-framework-bom-6.1.11.pom -Matt Pavlovich > On Aug 2, 2024, at 1:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote. > > This release includes

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release

2024-08-03 Thread Clebert Suconic
>> >> >> >> How do we improve the stability of NIO channel >> >> Let me come up with design document >> >> >> >> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, 05:31 Clebert Suconic, >> wrote: >> >>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ A

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-03 Thread Jamie G.
ronique provient d’un expéditeur externe. Ne > cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne pouvez pas > confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain que le > contenu ne présente aucun risque. > > > > > > > Hi everyone, >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release

2024-08-03 Thread Koteswararao Gundapaneni
hannel > > Let me come up with design document > > > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, 05:31 Clebert Suconic, > wrote: > >> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release. >> >> >> I would like to highlight the following: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-03 Thread Liao, Ken
e le contenu ne présente aucun risque. Hi everyone, I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote. This release includes 16 fixes and updates, especially: - add a BoM - fixes on the Message REST API, especially concurrent access - Spring 6.1.11 update - fix NoClassDefFound

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release

2024-08-03 Thread Koteswararao Gundapaneni
Hi Team How do we improve the stability of NIO channel Let me come up with design document On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, 05:31 Clebert Suconic, wrote: > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release. > > > I would like to highlight the following: > > * N

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release

2024-08-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi everyone, I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.3 release to your vote. This release includes 16 fixes and updates, especially: - add a BoM - fixes on the Message REST API, especially concurrent access - Spring 6.1.11 update - fix NoClassDefFound on bin/activemq export command line - several

[ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 released

2024-07-29 Thread Clebert Suconic
I'm pleased to announce the release of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release Downloads are now available at: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/ For a complete list of updates: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.36.0 I would

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release

2024-07-29 Thread Clebert Suconic
upload everything and send the announcement when everything is synced up. thanks again On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:00 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release. > > > I would like to highlight the following: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release

2024-07-29 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 01:01, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release. > > > I would like to highlight the following: > > * Numerous dependency upgrades triggered by integration with GitHub's > Dependabot. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release

2024-07-26 Thread Timothy Bish
On 7/25/24 20:00, Clebert Suconic wrote: I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release. I would like to highlight the following: * Numerous dependency upgrades triggered by integration with GitHub's Dependabot. * Stability improvement for use-cases involving slow

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release

2024-07-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 2:00 AM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release. > > > I would like to highlight the following: > > * Numerous dependency upgrades triggered by integration with

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release

2024-07-26 Thread Domenico Francesco Bruscino
ally record my +1 binding record > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:00 PM Clebert Suconic > wrote: > > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release. > > > > > > I would like to highlight the following: > > > > * Numero

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release

2024-07-25 Thread Clebert Suconic
this is to officially record my +1 binding record On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:00 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release. > > > I would like to highlight the following: > > * Numerous dependency upgrades triggered by inte

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release

2024-07-25 Thread Clebert Suconic
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release. I would like to highlight the following: * Numerous dependency upgrades triggered by integration with GitHub's Dependabot. * Stability improvement for use-cases involving slower IO devices (e.g. NFS) and the NIO journa

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >