e: v6.2.0 JMS Shared Topic Subscriptions — do you have a draft PR or design
> approach for this? The previously discussed approaches would require
> significant updates and it would be appreciated to have plenty of time to
> review.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Pavlovich
>
> >
ve a draft PR or design
> approach for this? The previously discussed approaches would require
> significant updates and it would be appreciated to have plenty of time to
> review.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Sep 13, 2024, at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré w
tQ codebase.
Thanks and best regards,
Clebert.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
uld
be to combine the existing flexibility of ActiveMQ with the performance of
HornetQ.
Anyway, these are just some initial ideas, for now I'm really just
interested to know how the ActiveMQ community would feel about a
donation of
the HornetQ codebase.
Thanks and best regards,
Clebert.
--
J
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
+1 for separate repo. It makes sense.
Regards
JB
Original message
From: Clebert Suconic
Date:10/10/2014 16:20 (GMT+01:00)
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: Possible HornetQ donation to ActiveMQ
I'm +1 for a separate repo as long as it's git... we can merge
will
create a 5.10.x maintenance branch and start porting the most relevant
and only compatible fixes.
Thoughts?
Hadrian
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
Original message
From: Claus Ibsen
Date:16/01/2015 08:02 (GMT+01:00)
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 5.10.1 (3rd attempt)
Hi
I gave the RC a test spin with latest Camel source code.
And the sprin
NOTE: I used Hadrian's prior thread as a template (thank you Hadrian).
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-1-3rd-attempt-tp4689959.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Bap
1 disapprove (and reason why)
Here's my +1
Regards,
Gary.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
+1
Regards
JB
On 01/05/2015 07:27 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days.
I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow overlooked.
Any objection to rename?
Hadrian
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthra
wants to discuss or merge these changes? :-)
Secondly, i want to improve the documentation.
May i have write access to the wiki - i.e. the pages referenced at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5448.
Regards
Marc
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
to have
in ActiveMQ?
Jakub
Cool stuff, definitely seems like something we ought to consider adding.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
cement a few minor versions
later
(who trusts a .0 version anyway?).
If the answer is no
(or not yet) then HornetQ should probably appear as an
ActiveMQ
sub-project, just like Apollo (still) is. HornetQ can evolve there
and
come closer to ActiveMQ "the next generation".
i All,
It was mentioned on another thread that ActiveMQ has hard challenges
with CPU core/thread scaling - I was wondering if there was a test
case/script published some where that shows this issue occurring?
Cheers,
Jamie
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
T
bring HornetQ folks
into
the AMQ PMC. I don't believe that happened (someone please correct me
if I
have it wrong).
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
nabble.com/DISCUSS-HornetQ-ActiveMQ-s-next-generation-
tp4693781p4693856.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev ma
com/VOTE-Accept-hornetq-code-grant-and-active-committers-td4685833.html
[2]
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Accept-hornetq-code-grant-and-active-committers-td4686006.html
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
n, we do this
sort of thing already with the persistence providers, so maybe there's
an opportunity here as well.
Thoughts?
James
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
r a 2-3 days if possible. Before I do this, however, I'd
like to know who else is planning to attend.
Bruce
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
hours.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
pache/activemq/pulls ?
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
mple first step. If anyone would like to
contribute something (e.g. a Maven profile) that Jenkins could invoke to
perform this general testing for PRs feel free. I can change the job to
execute any Maven target.
The job is at https://builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ-PR-Build/.
Justin
--
Jean-B
ev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
-support-tp4681089p4697789.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
+1
RegardsJB
Original message
From: Daniel Kulp
Date: 06/08/2015 16:57 (GMT+01:00)
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.11.2
This is a vote to release Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.2
Staging area:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapach
g:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=a9eeb03520f074d5013239b8d8708a05ba31e176
Please vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72
hours.
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.0
[ ] -1 (provide specific comments)
Here's my +1
rove this release. The vote will remain open for 72
hours.
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1
[ ] -1 (provide specific comments)
Here's my +1 (non-binding)
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
ed9f6e564
Please vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72
hours.
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.1
[ ] -1 (provide specific comments)
Here's my +1 (non-binding)
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
=a820bfb4c5489ed842efc6ef5702f0fc21975c41
Issues resolved:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12333254
This vote will be open till Monday. Here is my +1
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
protocols using:
feature:repo-add
mvn:org.apache.activemq/artemis-features/1.1.1-SNAPSHOT/xml
feature:install artemis-core artemis-hornetq artemis-stomp artemis-mqtt
artemis-amqp
I would be happy about your feedback.
Christian
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
ecure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12329848
I was thinking about calling a vote for a release in the 2-3 week time
frame and wanted to see if there were any blockers that would prevent this.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12333874
Most importantly, it contains the fix for CVE-2015-5254.
If anyone has any blockers, let me know.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
ected. what also covers other questions we had here on this
thread.
--
Clebert Suconic
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Hi
I already have an improved docker image with karaf and ActiveMQ. We have a
discussion at Apache about where to put this.
For now it's on my local server. I don't think it should go directly in the
project.
Regards
JB
On Aug 16, 2016, 09:10, at 09:10, "Ismaël Mejía" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I h
Good idea Hadrian.
I will try to take a look.
Regards
JB
On Oct 23, 2016, 03:48, at 03:48, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>There are a number of old, even very old, PRs open [1]. Some I suspect
>are not relevant anymore. It'd be great if somebody could look into
>them
>and close them down. I will
mmit saying.
> "This closes #NR"
>- by asking infra
>
>
>If the PR is stale you will need to ask infra. As no one outside the
>Apache
>infra have auth to close the PR.
>
>On Sunday, October 23, 2016, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>wrote:
>
>> Good idea Hadri
+1
Regards
JB
On Oct 28, 2016, 09:19, at 09:19, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>+1
>
>On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>> There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I
>> don't really think anyone will be using it:
>>
>> - aerogear:
>> * It's not workin
t need a closer attentions. I saw that cshannon
merged a PR, I looked at it too, but I am not sure how it was tested as
many test fail intermittently, some just fail and jenkins didn't have a
clean build in a while. I'll look into those too.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 10/23/2016 02:11 AM, Jean-Baptiste
networks.
This is a proof of concept, just to show it’s possible.
I hope this helps others.
Cheers,
Antoine
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
+1
Regards
JB
On Nov 16, 2016, 12:15, at 12:15, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
>+1
>
>Regards
>--
>Dejan Bosanac
>http://sensatic.net/about
>
>On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Bennet Schulz
>wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> > Am 15.11.2016 um 15:16 schrieb Clebert Suconic <
>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>>
rove this release. The vote will remain open for 72
hours.
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.14.2
[ ] -1 (provide specific comments)
Here's my +1
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Agree with Christian. It's a bit unfortunate.
Regards
JB
On Dec 8, 2016, 07:53, at 07:53, Christian Schneider
wrote:
>As artemis is an open source project I would not use a marketing like
>reason for a new major version (like a certain feature set).
>Instead I would use a major version to rem
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Dec 19, 2016, 14:02, at 14:02, Christopher Shannon
wrote:
>+1
>
>On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Christian Schneider
> wrote:
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> On 16.12.2016 20:23, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a vote to release Apache ActiveMQ 5.13.5
:).
Maybe bring Artemis a bit more up front on the website and make the
look and feel a bit more modern and clean.
Anyone available to help here? :)
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Agree to create a more generic repo as it could contain different modules in
the future.
Regards
JB
On Feb 1, 2017, 13:45, at 13:45, Christopher Shannon
wrote:
>I'm going to ping infra to create a new project but wanted to get some
>feedback from people first. The main motivation for this ut
Yes, it just takes some time for the first sync.
Regards
JB
On Feb 2, 2017, 17:58, at 17:58, Christopher Shannon
wrote:
>I believe the mirror should happen automatically within 24 hours.
>
>On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Andy Taylor
>wrote:
>
>> can we get it mirrored in Github?
>>
>> On 2
Hi Christian
It sounds good to me.
Thanks.
Regards
JB
On Feb 7, 2017, 06:38, at 06:38, Christian Schneider
wrote:
>There are some issues supporting the new camel version 2.18.x in
>activemq. See
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6585
>
>In the issue we discussed that it would be bet
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sep 28, 2017, 19:23, at 19:23, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>+1
>
>On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:03 PM Robbie Gemmell
>
>wrote:
>
>> On 28 September 2017 at 16:04, Christopher Shannon
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Everyone,
>> >
>> > I have re-created the ActiveMQ 5.15.1 release and it's
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Oct 18, 2017, 12:56, at 12:56, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>On 17 October 2017 at 15:37, Christopher Shannon
> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I have created the ActiveMQ 5.15.2 release and it's ready for a vote.
>>
>> The list of resolved issues is here:
>>
>https://issues.ap
No objection from my side.
Regards
JB
On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce"
wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>the presence there. Similar to other Apache projects have.
>
>It is possible to make a group account so would p
+1
Regards
JB
Le 17 mai 2018 à 20:15, à 20:15, Christopher Shannon
a écrit:
>Hi Everyone,
>
>I have created the ActiveMQ 5.15.4 release and it's ready for a vote.
>This
>release includes 10 fixes/improvements.
>
>The list of resolved issues is here:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Releas
Hi all,
as you know, ActiveMQ is used in ServiceMix as default message broker.
ServiceMix 3.3.x uses Spring configuration and loads the ActiveMQ bean
in activemq.xml Spring file:
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";>
+1 (non-binding)
Regards
JB
On 08/15/2010 09:01 AM, Rob Davies wrote:
+1
On 14 Aug 2010, at 02:17, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
A new release activemq-5.4.0 is out with approximately 283 issues resolved.
Please find the staging repo here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapach
gards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On 03/29/2011 10:06 AM, Rob Davies wrote:
+1
On 28 Mar 2011, at 21:03, Gary Tully wrote:
Hi all,
I've just cut a release candidate for the 5.5.0 release.
The main points to note are described in the new features page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACT
te to approve this release
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.5.1[ ] -1 Veto the
release (provide specific comments)
Here's my +1
Regards,
Hiram
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com/
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Hi all,
The ActiveMQ Jira doesn't seem to be up to date. ActiveMQ 5.5.1 has been
released (mostly the same as ActiveMQ 5.5.0 but with a "license legal"
fix), however this version is still flagged as "unreleased".
Could you update it please ?
Thanks
Regards
JB
--
J
Hi Dejan,
yeah, it's done and the issues have been moved to 5.6.0 version.
Thanks !!
Regards
JB
On 10/21/2011 11:29 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
Hi JB,
this should be fixed now. Thanks!
Regards
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend -
Hi folks,
I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee.
This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially:
- fixes on the STOMP protocol
- fix on KahaDB (on the recovery files)
- improvement on the webconsole (e.g. cache control policy)
- dependency updates (spring,
Hi Bruce
I will complete the ActiveMQ Classic part asap.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 3:31 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> It's time to assemble the latest report to the board. Let's aim to submit
> this report by Oct 8.
>
> To contribute to the board report, please following the step
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 3:46 PM Andy Taylor wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.0.0 release.
>
> This is the 1st release of the ActiveMQ Console so only has 1 jira
>
> [ARTEMIS-4680] - Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4
>
> The release
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 7:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee.
>
> This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially:
> - fixes on the STOMP protocol
>
a and website.
Thanks all for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 7:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 release to your votee.
>
> This release includes fixes and dependency updates, especially:
> - fixes on the
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.6 release.
It's a maintenance release on the ActiveMQ 5.18.x series, bringing:
- fixes on the STOMP protocol
- fix on KahaDB (on the recovery files)
- improvements on the WebConsole (e.g. cache control policy)
- dependency updates (spri
t; so please take five minutes today to contribute!
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 9:58 AM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> > Thank you, JB!
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 9:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > wrote:
> >
> >> H
501 - 569 of 569 matches
Mail list logo
