Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 1.0.0-rc1 Release

2022-03-31 Thread Muhammad Shoaib
+1 - Verified commit hash is correct. - Verified Signatures. - Verified download links are valid. - Verified LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files. - Verified that all files have the appropriate licence header where applicable. - Verified that all links above are valid. On Th

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 1.0.0-rc1 Release

2022-03-31 Thread John Gemignani
+1 - Verified commit hash is correct. - Verified Signatures. - Verified download links are valid. - Verified LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files. - Verified that all files have the appropriate licence header where applicable. - Verified that all links above are valid. On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:4

Re:[VOTE] Apache AGE 1.0.0-rc1 Release

2022-03-31 Thread Juan Pan
Hi, +1, here is my checking list. [x] Download links are valid. [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files are correct. [x] All files have license headers if necessary. --

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 1.0.0 Release

2022-03-31 Thread Young Seung Andrew Ko
A reminder This voting is closed and has been reopened with a title "[VOTE] Apache AGE 1.0.0-rc1 Release" Thanks On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:14 PM VUONG QUOC Viet wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 3:04 AM John Gemignani > > wrote: > > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > We do very much appreciate your

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 1.0.0-rc1 Release

2022-03-31 Thread VUONG QUOC Viet
+1 Checked - The LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files exist. - The word "incubating" is in the release file name. - The Download links work. - All the files have license headers if required. Thanks. On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 9:59 AM Young Seung Andrew Ko < youngseung.and...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 1.0.0 Release

2022-03-31 Thread VUONG QUOC Viet
+1 On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 3:04 AM John Gemignani wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > We do very much appreciate your activity however,... > > This is a thread for voting on a specific release and whether all the files > meet Apache's criteria. Please do not reply to it with anything unrelated > to the spec