jrgemignani commented on issue #321:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/321#issuecomment-1282646770
Sorry, I should have noted the following before suggesting closing the issue
-
If those regression tests are supposed to throw errors **and** there isn't a
comment stating that
jrgemignani commented on issue #45:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/45#issuecomment-1282657193
I will try to see if I can get others engaged that can help.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
TropicalPenguin commented on issue #330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/330#issuecomment-1282802614
Sorry @jrgemignani ; In trying to simplify the example (by using 0 as a
placeholder for the actual ID), I hadn't realised I just made the actual issue
harder to reproduce 😅.
jrgemignani commented on issue #330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/330#issuecomment-1282936299
The following -
`CREATE (a:A {foo:1})-[:incs]->(:C), (a)-[:incs]->(:C) RETURN a`
creates 2 **distinct** paths joined at node **a**. So, 3 **distinct** nodes
and 2 **disti
TropicalPenguin commented on issue #330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/330#issuecomment-1282939163
> There isn't a path from a to c _and then back to a_, without reusing an
edge. That's why it returns nothing.
I've added emphasis to where this is wrong: the 'd' edge is a b
TropicalPenguin commented on issue #330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/330#issuecomment-1282942228
In other words, it is expected to reuse the edge so as to be able to count
the number of such 'dependencies'
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respo
jrgemignani commented on issue #330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/330#issuecomment-1282947056
I modified my answer above slightly to make it a little more clear.
The bidirectional edge just means, any **available** edge connected to this
node. It doesn't say to reuse an e
TropicalPenguin commented on issue #330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/330#issuecomment-1282950694
While it is true that it doesn't _mandate_ reusing an edge, what I've come
to expect from other implementations of Cypher is that it also isn't restricted
to only following untrav
jrgemignani commented on issue #330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/330#issuecomment-1282992051
It is not a limitation, it **depends** on the graph given and the
"technical" **definition** of a path.
But, just for a moment, think of the implications of allowing an edge to b
Thank you, everyone, for your great suggestions and feedback.
Based on the votes and recommendations, I am closing this discussion; we will
choose 1.1.0 prefix for this release.
Thank you again,
Eya
On 2022/09/29 19:18:07 Eya Badal wrote:
> Dear Everyone,
>
> We are planning on our first
beinjamin commented on issue #45:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-viewer/issues/45#issuecomment-1283147369
hi
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscr
beinjamin commented on issue #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-viewer/issues/21#issuecomment-1283147589
hi
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscr
TropicalPenguin commented on issue #330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/330#issuecomment-1283474368
> Btw, as it is always possible that we got something incorrect or
overlooked something, I ran your query on Neo4j to make sure that our
implementation conforms with theirs and it
13 matches
Mail list logo
