cho2hhun opened a new issue, #1234:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1234
I've used Agens Graph and AGE many times, and I think there is a point that
hope to revise like Agens Graph
In AGE, it cannot use **PostgreSQL function in Cypher query** but Agens
Graph was possible to
cho2hhun commented on issue #1226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1226#issuecomment-1724698016
Hello @jrgemignani !!
For example if i try to make table with `SELECT` query that is including
cypher query, then **_table_ and _temporary table_ is not created**
below is
cho2hhun commented on issue #1225:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1225#issuecomment-1724693861
@KamleshKumar427 Thank you for your advice!
I'de read many times the document that you linked, But in that Document, I
Think There are problems also :(
First
The Cypher
cho2hhun commented on issue #1225:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1225#issuecomment-1724628778
Hi @Allison-E I've tried various Code but Problems are like that
1. agtype only possible to cast as 'varchar' for string Data, not 'text' etc
2. actually agtype is normally used
Vote: +1 binding
I did the usual checks:
- Signature and hash
- Links and tags
- LICENSE and NOTICE
- No unexpected binary files
Cheers
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:11 AM Muhammad Taha Naveed
wrote:
> +1
>
> - Signature and Hash => checked
> - Tags and links => checked
> - No unexpected binary fi
jimenasansav commented on issue #1217:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1217#issuecomment-1724558361
Hi @iabmatos, thank you for sharing your issues!
Please do not hesitate to share other problems you are facing. Our team is
always willing to help!
--
This is an automated mes
jrgemignani commented on issue #1219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1219#issuecomment-1724484103
The query also succeeds in these cases -
```
psql-15.4-5432-pgsql=# SELECT * FROM cypher('xyz', $$ MATCH
(x:Label1{arr:[1,2,3,4]})
MERGE (y:Label2{key1:2, key2:x.arr, key
ksheroz commented on issue #1219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1219#issuecomment-1724030759
> Some observations:
>
> * The same query with `CREATE` instead of `MERGE` works just fine
>
> ```
> SELECT * FROM cypher('xyz',
> $$
> MATCH (x:Label1{arr:[1,2,3,4
+1
- Signature and Hash => checked
- Tags and links => checked
- No unexpected binary files => checked
- Validity of release notes => checked
- Regression tests => checked (24 passing)
- Driver tests => checked
Regards
Muhammad Taha Naveed
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 5:15 AM John Gemignani
wrote:
Dear Apache Community,
I am writing to vote for this release.
+1
Checked:
- Signature, hash
- Links, tags
- LICENSE and NOTICE
- Unexpected binary files (none)
Regards,
Rafsun Masud
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:15 PM John Gemignani
wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> Please carefully read all in
Dear Apache AGE Community,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to formally cast my vote
for the approval of Apache AGE version 1.4.0 for PG15.
My vote is as follows:
+1 (Binding)
I have conducted a thorough review of the release candidate and have
ensured that the following criteria
jrgemignani commented on issue #1000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1000#issuecomment-1723634301
@vladiksun Yes, @rafsun42 and @dehowef have both been working on PRs for
improving WHERE performance. Hopefully, we'll have them all out by the end of
the week.
--
This is an auto
vladiksun commented on issue #1000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1000#issuecomment-1723634217
@jrgemignani, @rafsun42 ok I will create a new issue for the proposed
solution for IN operator and link it to the this one. Thank you.
--
This is an automated message from the Apach
jrgemignani commented on issue #1000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1000#issuecomment-1723626748
@vladiksun We probably should keep the issues separate but link them. Really
long threads can lose their readability, especially if they diverge too much.
Also, having a long thread
vladiksun commented on issue #1000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1000#issuecomment-1723616635
@jrgemignani I believe @rafsun42 also suggested the solution for IN
operator. I can move the issue with "IN" operator to another ticket. Let me
know if it is convenient to do so or lea
jrgemignani commented on issue #1000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1000#issuecomment-1723595479
@vladiksun We should probably look into these later queries separately. My
tests were only against your query at the top of this thread and only on my
server. If the issue with using
vladiksun commented on issue #1000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1000#issuecomment-1723307224
@jrgemignani Thanks for sharing the PR. I have built that branch to see how
it could affect our typical queries.
It turns out that for our use cases, we do not see much difference.
CapnSpek commented on issue #1219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1219#issuecomment-1723262498
The same query also fails if instead of an array, we have any other datatype.
If the setup is changed to
...
SELECT * FROM cypher('xyz',
$$
CREATE (x:Label1{arr:[1,2,3,
CapnSpek commented on issue #1219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1219#issuecomment-1723217422
Some observations:
- The same query with `CREATE` instead of `MERGE` works just fine
```
SELECT * FROM cypher('xyz',
$$
MATCH (x:Label1{arr:[1,2,3,4]})
CREATE (y:La
19 matches
Mail list logo
