danny50610 opened a new pull request, #348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/pull/348
Based on the tutorial
First run this
```
PREPARE cypher_stored_procedure(agtype) AS
SELECT *
FROM cypher('expr', $$
MATCH (v:Person)
WHERE v.name = $name
RE
ysvoon commented on issue #2198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198#issuecomment-3195166929
@jrgemignani Hello, haven't heard back in some time, just wanted to check if
everything's okay and if you've managed to have a look at the above comments? :)
--
This is an automated mes
mkranjac commented on issue #998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/998#issuecomment-3193808629
+1
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3192874888
@serdarmicrosoft After doing some research, I'm not sure we can improve this
particular query any further with indexes. As it is using hash joins -
> In PostgreSQL, a hash join
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3190070294
@serdarmicrosoft I removed the rest leaving -
```
psql-17.5-5432-pgsql=# select tablename,indexname,indexdef from pg_indexes
where schemaname = 'goodreads_graph_x';
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3189979656
@serdarmicrosoft I removed the btree indexes on id for User, Book, Author,
and Review. There wasn't any noticeable difference.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git S
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3189729702
@serdarmicrosoft I removed the gin indexes on properties for User, Book,
Author, and Review. It appears to have minimal (~1ms) impact.
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3189495594
@serdarmicrosoft Unfortunately, no. agefreighter adds in indexes and it
doesn't look like indexes can be removed. Or, at least that is my understanding.
--
This is an automated
mstrYoda commented on issue #187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-viewer/issues/187#issuecomment-3188899290
> > The first part i have solved installing babel/runtime by itself throught
a command `npm install @babel/runtime`
> > But the second i still have issues with, i don't know why
serdarmicrosoft commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3187934958
@jrgemignani the results look amazing. Have you tried them with or without
indexes?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, plea
mstrYoda opened a new issue, #2208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2208
When I pull apache age from macOS machine it gives following error:
WARNING: image with reference apache/age:latest was found but its platform
(linux/amd64) does not match the specified platform (linux/
Phasheng closed issue #2205: left() function fails to handle large negative
integers correctly
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2205
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
Phasheng closed issue #2201: Unexpected behavior when using empty string '' in
string functions in Apache AGE
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2201
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
jrgemignani commented on issue #2205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2205#issuecomment-3185283924
@Phasheng PR #2207 corrects this issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
jrgemignani commented on issue #2201:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2201#issuecomment-3185017863
This has been resolved. Please review and close the ticket.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t
Phasheng opened a new issue, #2205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2205
**Describe the bug**
I discovered that left() function incorrectly processes large negative
integers below INT_MIN instead of throwing error.
**How are you accessing AGE (Command line, driver, etc.)?
jrgemignani commented on issue #2201:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2201#issuecomment-3180847449
PR #2203 addresses this issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
MuhammadTahaNaveed commented on issue #2201:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2201#issuecomment-3180438704
> I think we should align this with Neo4j.
Agreed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
jrgemignani commented on issue #2201:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2201#issuecomment-3177264268
@Phasheng AGE text functions are generally set up to return NULL on an empty
string. I think we should align this with Neo4j.
@MuhammadTahaNaveed thoughts?
--
This is an aut
Phasheng closed issue #2202: Unexpected behavior when using empty string '' in
string functions in Apache AGE
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2202
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
Phasheng closed issue #2202: Unexpected behavior when using empty string '' in
string functions in Apache AGE
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2202
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
Phasheng opened a new issue, #2201:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2201
**Describe the bug**
I observed an unexpected behavior in Apache AGE when using empty strings
('') as arguments in string functions such as toLower. According to the
documentation, toLower(NULL) returns NU
Phasheng opened a new issue, #2202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2202
**Describe the bug**
I observed an unexpected behavior in Apache AGE when using empty strings
('') as arguments in string functions such as toLower. According to the
documentation, toLower(NULL) returns NU
ysvoon commented on issue #2198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198#issuecomment-3173234918
@jrgemignani Hi, while you are checking the above comments, may I
additionally ask if the 1.6.0 release will be backward compatible? For e.g.:
might we need major code changes should we u
AnnXie2001 opened a new issue, #2200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2200
**Describe the bug**
if we use not exists to find a path，the age will pass the query that cannot
optimize to use anti join. So, when the table is large, the speed is so low.
**How are you accessing
jrgemignani commented on issue #2198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198#issuecomment-310908
@ysvoon No set date, unfortunately. I will try to look at what you posted
above sometime tomorrow.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
ysvoon commented on issue #2198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198#issuecomment-3166587595
@jrgemignani I see, thank you for the information, is there a set date for
the 1.6.0 release to be pushed out?
Additionally, would like to ask if others been successful to use apach
jrgemignani commented on issue #2198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198#issuecomment-3166548781
@ysvoon The set/merge issue #1907 was resolved but has not been released and
is not part of 1.5.0.
I am working on starting the release of 1.6.0 in the next few weeks.
--
Th
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3166241750
@serdarmicrosoft PR #2199 adds additional variables that can have a huge
impact on the performance of this query. Below I have added the output of
explain analyze on my server for th
ysvoon commented on issue #2198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198#issuecomment-3160397531
> This is due to the 2 MATCH commands used in creating the edges, as you are
building your edges from the Person table; this is a O(n^2) operation.
>
> You might want to try the MER
iromanre opened a new issue, #188:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-viewer/issues/188
I think it would be very useful to be able to configure a default database
connection.
This way, when the service starts it will automatically connect to a
previously configured database.
This woul
xplatsolutions commented on issue #998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/998#issuecomment-3159472301
+1
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscr
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3157743632
@serdarmicrosoft I am working on a potential fix to this issue. My tests, so
far, show nearly identical execution times between the two queries.
--
This is an automated message fr
jrgemignani commented on issue #2198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198#issuecomment-3155957266
> For vertex graph creation, this process was fairly fast, we only observe
this performance issue with the edge creation process.
This is due to the 2 MATCH commands used in cr
ysvoon commented on issue #2198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198#issuecomment-3153047731
> [@ysvoon](https://github.com/ysvoon) What I can say about your query above
is that it is not scalable for larger datasets; let me see if I can explain
why,...
>
> Basically, what
ysvoon commented on issue #2198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198#issuecomment-3153036994
> [@ysvoon](https://github.com/ysvoon) Could you provide the query plan?
Also, are you increasing the size of Person? Meaning, adding in more people?
>
> For the query plan, use exp
jrgemignani commented on issue #2198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198#issuecomment-3151463677
@ysvoon What I can say about your query above is that it is not scalable for
larger datasets; let me see if I can explain why,...
Basically, what you are asking, in pseudo cod
jrgemignani commented on issue #2198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198#issuecomment-3151438436
@ysvoon Could you provide the query plan?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
ysvoon commented on issue #2177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2177#issuecomment-3151140469
Hi @jrgemignani, I've created a separate issue with the sample query and
what we've tried and the query plan here
https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198
--
This is an automated mess
jrgemignani commented on issue #2177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2177#issuecomment-3150971836
@ysvoon Could you provide your query and execution plan?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
ysvoon opened a new issue, #2198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2198
### Questions:
1. How can I create index for graph tables?
2. How effective are they? I am using a gin index right now on properties,
and I can see that the performance does improve for the initial 200k ed
ysvoon commented on issue #2177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2177#issuecomment-3149681581
Hi, doing something similar to this, we are using directed edges, and trying
to create >8 million edges, and noticed this similar trend in performance,
where after the approx 200k inserti
hamid-irannejad commented on issue #187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-viewer/issues/187#issuecomment-3146420952
> The first part i have solved installing babel/runtime by itself throught a
command `npm install @babel/runtime`
>
> But the second i still have issues with, i don't
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3145642720
@serdarmicrosoft Looking at the above I see something that could be
contributing to the extra time needed to execute the cypher command -
```
...
Group Key: (age_id(_agty
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3145606964
@serdarmicrosoft I need to point out that these 2 commands are still not
quite the same -
```
psql-17.5-5432-pgsql=# select count(*), u.id from goodreads_graph_x."User"
u,
jccampagne closed pull request #332: Age setup additional docs (version
alignment and tests).
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/pull/332
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
jrgemignani commented on issue #998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/998#issuecomment-3141384219
@jayanthkmr AFAIK, this is totally up to Amazon.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
jayanthkmr commented on issue #998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/998#issuecomment-3141376533
Any update here?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
gab-gil commented on issue #1783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1783#issuecomment-3139784713
+1
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
jrgemignani commented on issue #2111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2111#issuecomment-3138157374
@thomastthai PG 17 is on the **PG17** branch and is current with the
**master**. So, if you want to use PG17.5 that branch should work for you.
Currently, I have started workin
thomastthai commented on issue #2111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2111#issuecomment-3138153284
Which branch should I use if I want to run AGE with PostgreSQL 17.5? I saw
the PG17 branch but wasn't sure. Master/main branch compiled and installed
fine. I've not run tests on it y
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3136971875
@serdarmicrosoft I should note that the SQL command above references Book,
so it is more comparable to the MATCH that does the same.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3136961271
@serdarmicrosoft @MuhammadTahaNaveed From my local system with the above
graph loaded (PG17, CentOS 10)-
**Graph statistics**
```
psql-17.5-5432-pgsql=# select * from cyp
iromanre commented on issue #187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-viewer/issues/187#issuecomment-3135451132
The first part i have solved installing babel/runtime by itself throught a
command
`npm install @babel/runtime`
But the second i still have issues with, i don't know why i
NathanInbar opened a new issue, #2195:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2195
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
When using Apache AGE with database clients that do not default to
autocommit (e.g., psycopg, JDBC), the extension requires an explicit
THEPADA commented on issue #998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/998#issuecomment-3123675185
+1!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e
erhebend-tai commented on issue #1705:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1705#issuecomment-3123612984
Research and development for SQL
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3104168476
> I'm curious if it's possible to further optimize this, ideally getting its
performance closer to the PostgreSQL equivalent, which runs the same query in
only 3.6 seconds.
@s
serdarmicrosoft commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3104155140
Sorry @jrgemignani I missed your question.
Here is the output of the queries:
EXPLAIN select count(*), u.id from "User" u, "HAS_INTERACTION" h, "Book" b
where u.id =
serdarmicrosoft commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3104006972
Thanks @MuhammadTahaNaveed and @jrgemignani We were able to significantly
improve the query's performance from 50 seconds down to 10 seconds just by
modifying () to (:Book). I'm
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3102699847
Btw, that would also be true for `()-`, coming from any node and `-[]`,
going through any edge. As each label is a table, you would want to restrict it
where possible for better per
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3102666463
> That said, I believe AGE should ideally be smart enough to infer and apply
such label constraints automatically to reduce unnecessary scans when label
filters are present elsewhere
dallasmarlow commented on issue #998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/998#issuecomment-3101521966
+1
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscrib
MuhammadTahaNaveed commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3098181976
@serdarmicrosoft In your SQL query, the tables are specified, but in Cypher
query, the target label is not specified which causes age to scan all the
vertex labels.
**S
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3097359401
@serdarmicrosoft Could you add in the output of explain for this. Both for
the sql and for the cypher -
```
EXPLAIN select count(*), u.id from "User" u, "HAS_INTERACTION" h,
jrgemignani commented on issue #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194#issuecomment-3089997721
@serdarmicrosoft It shouldn't run that slow, we will need to look into this.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
jrgemignani commented on issue #2111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2111#issuecomment-3085313759
@brecke I am working on it, just swamped with other tasks atm.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
brecke commented on issue #2111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2111#issuecomment-3083215268
any news on this front? I see there's a branch (behind master) PG17 and a
docker-container, but it would be great to have a proper official release soon,
if possible. Is there an ETA for
serdarmicrosoft opened a new issue, #2194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2194
I am executing a performance benchmarking for Apache AGE by using [goodreads
dataset](https://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~jmcauley/datasets/goodreads.html). I've found
a significant performance gap between a dire
alxndr commented on PR #347:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/pull/347#issuecomment-3070187509
@jrgemignani I've just updated the PR description:
> In the `Using Cypher with '='` section, the first example shows a result
table with the columns "name" and "age", however the S
hamid-irannejad commented on issue #187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-viewer/issues/187#issuecomment-3066645949
The below lines are also the remaining part of the error I got by running
"npm run start" command.
npm ERR! code ELIFECYCLE
npm ERR! errno 1
npm ERR! ag-viewer-
hamid-irannejad opened a new issue, #187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-viewer/issues/187
I did
> npm run setup
and then
> npm run start
but I got the following errors:
internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:883
throw err;
^
Error: Cannot find module '@babel/runt
jrgemignani commented on issue #2193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2193#issuecomment-3062962971
@AnnXie2001 It will be looked into. Until it can be fixed, though, please
use the **temporary** fix.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
AnnXie2001 commented on issue #2193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2193#issuecomment-3060927666
In my inspection, I found that if it is the first creation, the execution
plan of this statement will perform a join on an empty table, resulting in the
return being null. I wonder if
jrgemignani commented on issue #2193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2193#issuecomment-3058235296
@AnnXie2001 Verified in the master. It seems to happen with this command to
any **new** label. While the command does not execute correctly the first time,
it does create the new lab
jrgemignani commented on issue #998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/998#issuecomment-3058018565
@rafsun42
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
ramzimaalej commented on issue #998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/998#issuecomment-3053885728
+1
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe
hadfield commented on issue #998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/998#issuecomment-3053273408
+1
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscrib
AnnXie2001 opened a new issue, #2193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2193
**Describe the bug**
create … with … The execution plan of match is abnormal.
**How are you accessing AGE (Command line, driver, etc.)?**
- Command line
**What data setup do we need to
GitHub user serdarmicrosoft added a comment to the discussion: New Tag
Post-1.5.0 to Include Recent Commits
Great news @jrgemignani Appreciate the work being done to resolve the CI issue
in PG17. Do you have an estimate on when the release might be ready? Thanks.
GitHub link:
https://github.
gwenshap opened a new issue, #2192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2192
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
Different companies have rules and standards about where they install
extensions. As a result, most extensions support `CREATE EXTENSION
anvi233 commented on issue #185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-viewer/issues/185#issuecomment-2966608789
Same problem, has this problem been solved now?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
xephtar commented on issue #2187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2187#issuecomment-2965346631
Our graph is directed and connected, with relationships like A -> X or A ->
Y. When we perform a directed search starting from node X, we can't reach its
second-level neighbors by jumpin
jrgemignani commented on issue #2187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2187#issuecomment-2963306487
@xephtar Is there a reason that you need to match without direction **-[]-**
? That is, by far, one of the most resource intensive match patterns and
basically negates the value of a
xephtar opened a new issue, #2187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2187
### 🔍 Performance Optimization for Multi-Hop Traversal in Apache AGE
Context:
We are currently using Apache AGE and have the following graph structure:
```
(:A)-[:HAS_Y]->(:Y)
(:A)-[:H
jrgemignani closed issue #1850: Server crashes when executing SELECT * FROM
cypher('list_comprehension' ...)
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1850
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
jrgemignani closed issue #1611: List comprehension as property constraint of
MERGE clause errors out
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1611
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
jrgemignani closed issue #105: List comprehensions
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/105
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
jrgemignani commented on PR #347:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/pull/347#issuecomment-2959596676
@alxndr Could you please explain more of what and why you are adding it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
alxndr opened a new pull request, #347:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/pull/347
* add missing column name to `SELECT`
* more consistent capitalization of query terms
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
jrgemignani commented on issue #2111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2111#issuecomment-2956086580
We were able to fix the CI issues with PG17. Now we need to apply this fix
to the other branches. It looks like there were adjustments to privileges, on
Github's side.
For fut
nicholasveloso commented on issue #1121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/1121#issuecomment-2952664670
> PRs [#2088](https://github.com/apache/age/pull/2088) and
[#2172](https://github.com/apache/age/pull/2172) (in review) improve the
interoperability of age with other extensions.
jrgemignani commented on issue #2111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2111#issuecomment-2951584851
@dianaoa22 We've been working on PG17 the past few days. Unfortunately,
there have been issues with the CI that need to be fixed first.
--
This is an automated message from the Apa
dianaoa22 commented on issue #2111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2111#issuecomment-2951358833
Is there an updated timeline for when Apache AGE will officially support
PostgreSQL 17 in the 1.5.0 release?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
GitHub user jrgemignani added a comment to the discussion: New Tag Post-1.5.0
to Include Recent Commits
@serdarmicrosoft Just an update,... we're currently working on a CI issue in
PG17 that is holding up getting it ready for a release.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/age/discussions/
LpKronek commented on issue #998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/998#issuecomment-2929055683
+1
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e
btihen commented on issue #370:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/370#issuecomment-2925095603
# VERSION 0.7.0 - 2025-06-01
**Generic Queries** - ApacheAge::Node and ApacheAge::Edge can be used as the
base for a query
**Age Path** - nodes and edges combined (queries und
miro-ur commented on issue #998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/998#issuecomment-2920466940
Interested in this as well
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comm
xephtar commented on issue #690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/690#issuecomment-2915895274
Hi,
Years after initially optimizing this query in Neo4j, we're now considering
moving back to Apache AGE. Our graph structure is as follows:
A Label - HAS_Y -> Y Label
A L
mdianjun commented on issue #2179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2179#issuecomment-2911500398
I have fixed this issue in PR https://github.com/apache/age/pull/2178.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub a
1 - 100 of 4092 matches
Mail list logo
