+1
Finally VLE :)
Nice work guys !
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:38 AM Dehowe Feng wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have
> been
> working toward it.
>
> To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
>
> Functio
+1
John
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:42 PM Young Seung Andrew Ko <
youngseung.and...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
> Finally VLE :)
> Nice work guys !
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:38 AM Dehowe Feng
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Apache Community,
> >
> > This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. t
+1
On 2022/01/18 23:37:59 Dehowe Feng wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have been
> working toward it.
>
> To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
>
> Functionalities included and addressed in this re
+1
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 5:41 PM Alex Kwak wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2022/01/18 23:37:59 Dehowe Feng wrote:
> > Dear Apache Community,
> >
> > This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have
> been
> > working toward it.
> >
> > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http:
+1
On 19.01.22 00:37, Dehowe Feng wrote:
Dear Apache Community,
This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have been
working toward it.
To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
Functionalities included and addressed in this release:
*Add VLE c
+1
--
Nick Sorrell
513.288.1084
https://cint.io
From: Pieterjan De Potter
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 3:15 AM
To: dev@age.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 0.7.0 Release
+1
On 19.01.22 00:37, Dehowe Feng wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
Hello,
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files exist.
[ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
The following files with source coding are all from Postgres project?
apache-age-0.7.0-incubating/.gitign
Hi Trista,
>From the discussion from the last release the team reviewed the project and
determined that there was a large enough amount of the Postgres code base
in those files to warrant the Postgres header instead of the Apache header.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 6:35 AM Juan Pan wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Josh,
I see. I just want to double check the following files all comes from
PostgreSQL, not from others, right?
--
Juan Pan(Trista), Twitter: @tristaZero
On 01/23/2022 11:43,Josh Innis wrote:
Hi Trista,
From t
Hi Juan,
Not necessarily the file names but the contents of those files.
John
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022, 3:31 AM Juan Pan wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
>
> I see. I just want to double check the following files all comes from
> PostgreSQL, not from others, right?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
There is some code that the AGE team wrote that is in those files, but no
third party code is in those files.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 8:46 AM John Gemignani
wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
> Not necessarily the file names but the contents of those files.
>
>
> John
>
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022, 3:31 AM Juan Pan
Do we have a plan to transfer all pg files to an external directory? I have
seen we have many files like we have pointed.
Josh Innis 于2022年1月24日周一 02:03写道:
> There is some code that the AGE team wrote that is in those files, but no
> third party code is in those files.
>
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 a
vongosling -
"Do we have a plan to transfer all pg files to an external directory?"
Could you please clarify what *you *mean by an external directory? Is it
another directory in our repository or not in our repository at all?
Additionally, is this a requirement? Per Justin, or at least from my
u
Thanks, then +1 based on my checking
--
Juan Pan(Trista), Twitter: @tristaZero
On 01/24/2022 02:03,Josh Innis wrote:
There is some code that the AGE team wrote that is in those files, but no
third party code is in thos
I feel that we should ask this question: are we judging copyright claims at
high level or low levels of programming. Or rather: compiled or
non-compiled code. Take: src/include/parser/cypher_expr.h, this is a file
in incubator-Apache AGE. The name of the function call declared in that
function: tra
+1
I checked:
- LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER are ok
- No binary in the source distribution
- incubating is in the name
Dehowe Feng 于2022年1月19日周三 07:38写道:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have
> been
> working toward it.
>
> To learn
Kevin Ratnasekera
Fri, Sep 24, 2021, 5:04 PM
to dev
+1
I checked the following.
- Incubating in name.
- PGP Signatures.
- SHA512 Checksums.
- DISCLAIMER exists.
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine.
- ASF headers on source files.
Regards
Kevin
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:48 AM vongosling wro
Thanks for everyone's feedback and votes. I will now close this vote and
results will be sent shortly.
Best,
Dehowe
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:41 PM Kevin Ratnasekera
wrote:
> Kevin Ratnasekera
> Fri, Sep 24, 2021, 5:04 PM
> to dev
>
> +1
>
> I checked the following.
>
> - Incubating in name.
18 matches
Mail list logo