Re: Benchmarking Airflow

2019-07-02 Thread ramandu...@gmail.com
Hi Sergio, We did some benchmarking with Local & K8 Executor Mode. We observed that Each Airflow Tasks takes ~100 MB of memory in Local Executor Mode. With 16 GB of RAM we could run ~140 concurrent tasks. After this we started getting "can not allocate memory error". With K8 Executor memory

Meta DB transaction isolation level

2019-07-02 Thread Pala Muthiah
Hello everyone Wanted to find out what is the transaction isolation level used in airflow's MySQL meta db in your deployments. Does anybody use READ COMMITTED instead of the default REPEATABLE READ transaction isolation level of MySQL? Did you observe any issues? Thanks, pala

Benchmarking Airflow

2019-07-02 Thread Sergio Kef
Hey folks, Do we have something like airflow benchmarks? Seems that many people seem to struggle to understand the limitations of airflow (me included). Is there some existing work on bechmarking (ie define a few common cases and measure performance while increase volume of tasks)? I know it's

Re: Proposal: Restructure slack

2019-07-02 Thread Sergio Kef
Hi again, After some research on other communities and based on the comments above I restructure my proposal: Slack Channels: * announcements (as is) - new releases - community announcements * general - events (meetings, webinars, conferences, etc) - material (tutorials, blog

Re: [PROPOSE] Introduce and encourage pre-commit hooks framework to Airflow developer workflow

2019-07-02 Thread Maxime Beauchemin
+1 On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:20 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 We have been using this on some of our Astronomer repositories as well > and have been happy with it. > > Regards, > Kaxil > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019, 11:46 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > TL;DR: I would like to make a proposal to add (easily

Re: Proposal: Automatically mark stale PRs in github

2019-07-02 Thread Driesprong, Fokko
Great work Jarek. I think the stalebot is a great addition. Even if an issue gets closed unresolved, it is an indication to me that the issue might not be relevant. In the end you can always reopen issues again. Cheers, Fokko Op di 2 jul. 2019 om 07:41 schreef Jarek Potiuk > If we finally find

Re: [VOTE] Labelling scheme for the upcoming official docker images of Airflow

2019-07-02 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Just to remind - the vote is up till Thursday 7am CEST. W have so far +3 binding +5 non-binding votes so for now the status is PASS. Thanks for all who participated :). I encourage others as well. Anticipating positive vote I already implemented the scheme in the upcoming final commit from

Re: [PROPOSE] Introduce and encourage pre-commit hooks framework to Airflow developer workflow

2019-07-02 Thread Kaxil Naik
+1 We have been using this on some of our Astronomer repositories as well and have been happy with it. Regards, Kaxil On Tue, Jul 2, 2019, 11:46 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > TL;DR: I would like to make a proposal to add (easily managed) pre-commit > hooks with various lint checkers part of

[PROPOSE] Introduce and encourage pre-commit hooks framework to Airflow developer workflow

2019-07-02 Thread Jarek Potiuk
TL;DR: I would like to make a proposal to add (easily managed) pre-commit hooks with various lint checkers part of recommended (and encouraged) development workflow for Airflow. This will help with speeding-up local development cycle and decrease pressure on Travis CI. Over the last few months