Re: [PROPOSE] Ease future migration path to 2.0 by provider's operators/hook backporting to 1.10.*

https://github.com/ashb/airflow-submodule-test That seems to work in any order things are installed, at least on python 3.7. I've had a stressful few days so I may have missed something. Please tell me if there's a case I've missed, or if this is

Re: [PROPOSE] Ease future migration path to 2.0 by provider's operators/hook backporting to 1.10.*

Pretty hard pass from me in airflow_ext. If it's released by airflow I want it to live under airflow.* (Anyone else is free to release packages under any namespace they choose) That said I think I've got something that works: /Users/ash/.virtualenvs/test-providers/lib/python3.7/site-packages/no

Re: [PROPOSE] Ease future migration path to 2.0 by provider's operators/hook backporting to 1.10.*

Hey Ash, Thanks for the offer. I must admin pkgutil and package namespaces are not the best documented part of python. I dug a deep deeper and I found a similar problem - https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/895. Seems that even if it is not explicitly explained in pkgutil documentation, th