I don't have any objection, however, this isn't a [VOTE] right? ;)
Op di 18 feb. 2020 om 00:08 schreef Jarek Potiuk :
> I see that it's quite welcome change, so I think if no-one else objects
> within three days, I consider that a lazy consensus (not that lazy in fact)
> :) https://www.apache.org
I see that it's quite welcome change, so I think if no-one else objects
within three days, I consider that a lazy consensus (not that lazy in fact)
:) https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 6:14 PM Maxime Beauchemin <
maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On M
+1
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 7:32 AM Daniel Imberman
wrote:
> +1 on my end!
>
> via Newton Mail
> [
> https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=dx&cv=10.0.32&pv=10.14.6&source=email_footer_2
> ]
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:30 AM, Driesprong, Fokko
>
> wrote:
> I like this as well. It will hopefully
+1 on my end!
via Newton Mail
[https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=dx&cv=10.0.32&pv=10.14.6&source=email_footer_2]
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:30 AM, Driesprong, Fokko
wrote:
I like this as well. It will hopefully also reduce the memory footprint of
Airflow.
The only thing I can think of is
+1 on voting.
I read the discussions very carefully and I agree that it is worth
creating a interm solution. It is a very good idea if it will not be a
temporary and experimental solution indefinitely. We have a clear
deadline, so we can go further with this.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 8:35 AM Jarek
I like this as well. It will hopefully also reduce the memory footprint of
Airflow.
The only thing I can think of is that it will reduce the test coverage, but
that's a vanity metric anyway :-)
Cheers, Fokko
Op za 15 feb. 2020 om 13:37 schreef Ash Berlin-Taylor :
> I'm massively in favour of th
