Hello Daniel and Greg.
I think the production image for Airflow is quite ready for the final
review and merge. I did some tests and I think it's quite complete now.
The PR is running it's Travis build:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7832
I already pushed the image to DockerHub - so that
Hello Mentors,
Please find the link for my proposal on some assorted issues in the
airflow and let me know if the format and content are fine.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iFZnnJJEVlHsUtB3hJ1vCIFWf2N8594_QFvZkqlzS84/edit?usp=sharing
This vote has passed with 5 +1 votes and no -1 votes.
Work will begin on this soon :)
-ash
On Mar 19 2020, at 8:53 pm, Maxime Beauchemin
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Solid work!
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:43 PM Jarek Potiuk
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:16 P
Hi all,
This vote has passed with:
- 9 +1 votes (binding)
- 0 -1 votes
Thanks, everyone! Can't wait to help in implementing this AIP :)
Keep safe,
Tomek
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:48 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
>
> +1 (binding) -- this will be a nice little polish to writing DAGs.
>
> -a
>
>
Yeah. It's just normal that people do not read instructions. But the more
we repeat the message in various places, the more people will notice. It's
just a matter of being persistent and patient.
How about the other part about lightweight process? Anyone has opinion on
that? I think we should at l
Hello Akbar - it looks great as a proposal!
Maybe someone who has more experience with the UI has some comments to
those proposals for the UI enhancements for 1.10 ?
J.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:13 PM Akbar B wrote:
> Thank you so much Jarek,
> Your words provided lot of insights. As you sai
I respond to it in the #gsoc channel in slack.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 6:06 PM yajna pandith
wrote:
> Regarding this particular problem statement i would like to seek some
> clarrifciation.
> < https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6419 > which states [
> dag_processor_manager/webserve
