Totally appreciate you doing this Ash, Love it!
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 11:43 PM Tao Feng wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:55 AM Soma S Dhavala
> wrote:
>
> > +1 👍
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 2:05 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> >
> > > 👏
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020, 08:28 Robin Edwards
Agree. I think I will eventually cut the release on Monday/Tuesday (we have
a long weekend starting tomorrow) which will make the date of release on
20th of June (a month after the original RC1 :( .. Took a long time but we
will have some real consistency in place + automated protection that will
k
I hope it's only temporary measure - we are likely to release 1.10.11 in a
few weeks and then we can even delete those images. But I do agree that
adding test in the name might be a better looking one. Ash - WDYT?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:25 PM Zikun Zhu wrote:
> When I looked at the tag "apach
+1 to changing that!
On Jun 10 2020, at 11:44 am, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> While preparing the final (?) release of backport operators I found one
> case where AWSBatchOperator is also a Hook:
>
> class AwsBatchOperator(BaseOperator, AwsBatchClientHook):
>
> Which is quite clearly wrong.
>
> Unl
While preparing the final (?) release of backport operators I found one
case where AWSBatchOperator is also a Hook:
class AwsBatchOperator(BaseOperator, AwsBatchClientHook):
Which is quite clearly wrong.
Unless someone objects I am going to change the Inheritance into
Composition.
J.
--
Jar
