[RESULT] [VOTE] Airflow Backport Providers 2020.6.24rc1

2020-06-23 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hey all, Airflow Backport Providers 2020.6.24c1 (based on the rc1 candidate) has been accepted. 3 "+1" binding votes received: - Jarek Potiuk (binding) - Kaxil Naik (binding) - Ash Berlin-Taylor (binding) 2 "+1" non-binding votes received: - Bas Harenslak (non-binding) - Kamil Breguła (non-bin

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Backport Providers 2020.6.24rc1

2020-06-23 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
+1 (binding) Lets do this! On Jun 23 2020, at 8:01 pm, Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:58 PM Kamil Breguła > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> I tested itand it is fantastic. This is a big step to facilitate >> migrations to Airflow 2.0 >> >> On Tue,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Backport Providers 2020.6.24rc1

2020-06-23 Thread Kaxil Naik
+1 (binding) On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:58 PM Kamil Breguła wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I tested itand it is fantastic. This is a big step to facilitate > migrations to Airflow 2.0 > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:48 PM Jarek Potiuk > wrote: > > > I would love some PMC votes :) > > > > On Tue

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Backport Providers 2020.6.24rc1

2020-06-23 Thread Kamil Breguła
+1 (non-binding) I tested itand it is fantastic. This is a big step to facilitate migrations to Airflow 2.0 On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:48 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > I would love some PMC votes :) > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:09 PM Bas Harenslak > wrote: > > > Tested importing, nothing weird

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Backport Providers 2020.6.24rc1

2020-06-23 Thread Jarek Potiuk
I would love some PMC votes :) On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:09 PM Bas Harenslak wrote: > Tested importing, nothing weird encountered. > > +1 (non-binding) > > Bas > > On 23 Jun 2020, at 13:27, Jarek Potiuk jarek.pot...@polidea.com>> wrote: > > Just a kind reminder :) ... The time is ticking .

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Backport Providers 2020.6.24rc1

2020-06-23 Thread Bas Harenslak
Tested importing, nothing weird encountered. +1 (non-binding) Bas On 23 Jun 2020, at 13:27, Jarek Potiuk mailto:jarek.pot...@polidea.com>> wrote: Just a kind reminder :) ... The time is ticking . Would be great to have some more votes by the end of today :) On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:44 AM

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Backport Providers 2020.6.24rc1

2020-06-23 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Just a kind reminder :) ... The time is ticking . Would be great to have some more votes by the end of today :) On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:44 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Just a kind reminder. I hope Wednesday morning we will be able to release > the first official Backport Providers packages. >

Re: [AIP-35] Add Signal Based Scheduling To Airflow

2020-06-23 Thread Kaxil Naik
Yes, this feature would be for post 2.0. I will document and post something in the coming days about 2.0. Currently, we are in working on releasing 1.10.11 (hopefully in next week or two) Regards, Kaxil On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:19 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > So far Airflow 2.0 has been a moving

Re: [AIP-35] Add Signal Based Scheduling To Airflow

2020-06-23 Thread Jarek Potiuk
So far Airflow 2.0 has been a moving target and it has no fixed timeline. This is one of the main reasons why I think we should all in the community pretty much focus on making sure we deliver 2.0 in it's currently planned "shape". From the past (and my own experience - I am one of the "guilty" on

Re: [AIP-35] Add Signal Based Scheduling To Airflow

2020-06-23 Thread Becket Qin
Hi Jarek, Thanks for the reply. I saw the AirFlow 2.0 roadmap[1] and I am wondering if there is a timeline for it? Also, do you see any potential conflict with some existing efforts on AirFlow 2.0? We don't want to interrupt the ongoing development pace. And we are happy to first implement a prot