After reviewing some issues I think we might need a few more labels like:
area:scheduling options
missing information
can't reproduce
maybe we can create a dedicated slack channel to work on the small details.
Elad
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:12 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> @paola - Unfortunately the
I think there was one point at the last meeting that we have not discussed
as we had no time - the documentation. I have some input to the discussion
so I thought I share it here before the next one. I believe we ended up of
"we have to think and review what to improve".
I personally think we have
True Kamil. We can do it now and the file vs. dag is an important
difference indeed!
J
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:44 AM Kamil Breguła
wrote:
> Only in some cases, we do not have a DAG ID, but only have the path to the
> file.
>
> In my opinion, we can do it now. One of the most important chan
Only in some cases, we do not have a DAG ID, but only have the path to the
file.
In my opinion, we can do it now. One of the most important changes is to
ensure a stable ID. Now we delete and add the errors again, and we should
check which errors should be deleted and which should be added. If we
I am all for it.
This should be - likely - connected with the future versioning of DAGs
(currently deferred to 2.1).
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-36+DAG+Versioning
- possibly, rather than being a separate AIP, it should be
incorporated there.
I believe in the versioning
