Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

Great work indeed & looking forward to it. My big +1 for the release, though I've not tested it myself, so ideally the vote doesn't count. On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:44 PM Tao Feng wrote: > +1 (binding) great work! > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 23:02 Deng Xiaodong wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding).

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 (binding) great work! On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 23:02 Deng Xiaodong wrote: > +1 (non-binding). > > The issues that can be confirmed in rc1/2 have been well fixed. > > Cannot wait to see the bunch of new nice features in 2.0 to be rolled out. > > > XD > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:00 Maxime

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 (non-binding). The issues that can be confirmed in rc1/2 have been well fixed. Cannot wait to see the bunch of new nice features in 2.0 to be rolled out. XD On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:00 Maxime Beauchemin wrote: > +1 binding > > !!! > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1, binding. AWESOME WORK We talked about this so much and now it's finally there. It almost.akes my cry ;-) Bolke Sent from my iPhone > On 14 Dec 2020, at 23:01, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >  > +1 (binding): RAT, SHA, GPG are all OK. > > * I run a few combinations of Python/Backends. > *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 (non-binding) ! Tested taskflow api tutorial in basic local setup. Tested a simple internal TFX example on Airflow in the same setup. Gerard Casas Saez Twitter | Cortex | @casassaez On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 6:00 PM Maxime Beauchemin <

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 binding !!! On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:42 PM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > +1 binding, tested it with kubernetes based deployments using > CeleryExecutor as well as locally > > Tomek > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:42 PM Ry Walker wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 binding, tested it with kubernetes based deployments using CeleryExecutor as well as locally Tomek On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:42 PM Ry Walker wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 3:38 PM Sid Anand wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Great work all! >> -s >> >> On Wed, Dec 16,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 3:38 PM Sid Anand wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Great work all! > -s > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:25 PM Kamil Breguła > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020, 21:24 Elad Kalif wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 (binding) Great work all! -s On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:25 PM Kamil Breguła wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020, 21:24 Elad Kalif wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:49 PM Vikram Koka wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 (binding) On Wed, Dec 16, 2020, 21:24 Elad Kalif wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:49 PM Vikram Koka wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 11:43 AM James Timmins >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:36 AM Daniel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:49 PM Vikram Koka wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 11:43 AM James Timmins > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:36 AM Daniel Imberman < >> daniel.imber...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 !! (binding) >>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 11:43 AM James Timmins wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:36 AM Daniel Imberman > wrote: > >> +1 !! (binding) >> >> via Newton Mail >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 16,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:36 AM Daniel Imberman wrote: > +1 !! (binding) > > via Newton Mail > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:18 AM, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Third time is the charm,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 !! (binding) via Newton Mail [https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=dx=10.0.51=10.15.7=email_footer_2] On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:18 AM, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: +1 (binding) Third time is the charm, hopefully. -ash On Mon, 14 Dec, 2020 at 23:00, Jarek Potiuk wrote: +1 (binding): RAT,

[Security Update] Upgrade to Airflow 1.10.14

Dear Airflow community, Please upgrade to Airflow 1.10.14, it contains a critical security fix. If you would like to stay on the same version then please make sure that your Airflow instance is not publicly routable. CVE for the same would be publicly announced on Monday, 21 Dec 2020. Regards,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 2.0.0 form 2.0.0rc3

+1 (binding) Third time is the charm, hopefully. -ash On Mon, 14 Dec, 2020 at 23:00, Jarek Potiuk wrote: +1 (binding): RAT, SHA, GPG are all OK. * I run a few combinations of Python/Backends. * All works fine with providers pre-installed. * The problem with S3 logging is fixed! STILL