Re: Triage role for Jed Cunnigham

2021-04-10 Thread Vikram Koka
+1 On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 4:24 PM Xinbin Huang wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 4:08 PM Tomasz Urbaszek > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 at 00:59, Daniel Imberman >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 3:54 PM, Ryan Hamilton < >> ryan.hamil...@astronomer.i

Re: Triage role for Jed Cunnigham

2021-04-10 Thread Xinbin Huang
+1 On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 4:08 PM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 at 00:59, Daniel Imberman > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 3:54 PM, Ryan Hamilton < > ryan.hamil...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 6:45 PM Kaxil Na

Re: Triage role for Jed Cunnigham

2021-04-10 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
+1 On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 at 00:59, Daniel Imberman wrote: > > +1 > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 3:54 PM, Ryan Hamilton > wrote: > > +1 > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 6:45 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I would like to propose that the triage role be given to Jed Cunnigham >> (Github Handl

Re: Triage role for Jed Cunnigham

2021-04-10 Thread Daniel Imberman
+1 On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 3:54 PM, Ryan Hamilton wrote: +1 On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 6:45 PM Kaxil Naik < kaxiln...@gmail.com [kaxiln...@gmail.com] > wrote: Hi folks, I would like to propose that the triage role be given to Jed Cunnigham (Github Handle: jedcunningham): This will allow Jed

Re: Triage role for Jed Cunnigham

2021-04-10 Thread Ryan Hamilton
+1 On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 6:45 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > Hi folks, > > I would like to propose that the triage role be given to Jed Cunnigham > (Github Handle: jedcunningham): > > This will allow Jed to triage Github issue while he is working on fixing > issues (currently focussed on reducing Kube

Triage role for Jed Cunnigham

2021-04-10 Thread Kaxil Naik
Hi folks, I would like to propose that the triage role be given to Jed Cunnigham (Github Handle: jedcunningham): This will allow Jed to triage Github issue while he is working on fixing issues (currently focussed on reducing Kubernetes Issues as part of https://github.com/apache/airflow/projects/

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release prepared 2021-04-07

2021-04-10 Thread Kaxil Naik
+1 binding Verified licenses, signature and SHA512 check Regards, Kaxil On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 1:24 PM wrote: > +1 binding > > sob., 10 kwi 2021 o 12:36 Tomasz Urbaszek > napisał(a): > > > > +1 binding > > > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 23:25, Xiaodong Deng wrote: > > > > > > +1 (binding).

Airflow Backport Providers 2021.4.10 (http only) are released

2021-04-10 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Dear Airflow community, I'm happy to announce that Airflow Backport Providers packages 2021.4.10 were just released. The source release, as well as the binary releases, are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/backport-providers/ We also made those versions availab

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Backport Providers (http only) 2021.4.10

2021-04-10 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Just to clarify - it was rc2 not rc1! On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 3:27 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey all, > > Airflow Backport Providers (http only) 2021.4.10 (based on the > 2021.4.10rc1 candidate) has been accepted. > > 3 "+1" binding votes received: > - Jarek Potiuk (binding) > - Kaxil Naik (bind

[RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Backport Providers (http only) 2021.4.10

2021-04-10 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hey all, Airflow Backport Providers (http only) 2021.4.10 (based on the 2021.4.10rc1 candidate) has been accepted. 3 "+1" binding votes received: - Jarek Potiuk (binding) - Kaxil Naik (binding) - Tomasz Urbaszek (binding) Big thanks https://github.com/odajun for reporting it and testing the fix

Proposal of change for self-hosted runners use by committers ?

2021-04-10 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hey all, I am following up with the CI/credits situation. I have a proposal on getting the credits used much lower for now (until we get more credits/solve it differently). I've already decreased the number of jobs needed and time needed to run for our tests even for Github Public runners and the

The CI situation/ask for help with credits

2021-04-10 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hello everyone, Probably some of you noticed (especially committers but also regular contributors) that our CI got quite a bit speedier over the last couple of months and also quite a bit more stable. But we need a bit more cloud credits to keep it this way :(. I am reaching out to the community

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release prepared 2021-04-07

2021-04-10 Thread ....
+1 binding sob., 10 kwi 2021 o 12:36 Tomasz Urbaszek napisał(a): > > +1 binding > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 23:25, Xiaodong Deng wrote: > > > > +1 (binding). > > > > Thanks Jarek and folks who help test. > > > > > > XD > > > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 10:23 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> > >> I'd appreci

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release prepared 2021-04-07

2021-04-10 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
+1 binding On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 23:25, Xiaodong Deng wrote: > > +1 (binding). > > Thanks Jarek and folks who help test. > > > XD > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 10:23 Jarek Potiuk wrote: >> >> I'd appreciate some votes/checks - also see the >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15241 for sta

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Backport Providers (http only) 2021.4.10rc2

2021-04-10 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
+1 binding On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 at 11:29, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > One more vote needed. Also it's been confirmed that it works by the user who > raised the issue : > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15198#issuecomment-815382368 > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 1:17 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Backport Providers (http only) 2021.4.10rc2

2021-04-10 Thread Jarek Potiuk
One more vote needed. Also it's been confirmed that it works by the user who raised the issue : https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15198#issuecomment-815382368 On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 1:17 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/back