Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (binding) On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 1:08 PM Josh Fell wrote: > +1 (non-binding) Very exciting > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 3:33 PM Jed Cunningham > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:08 AM Daniel Imberman < >> daniel.imber...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>>

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (non-binding) Very exciting On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 3:33 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:08 AM Daniel Imberman < > daniel.imber...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I would like to call for a vote on AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping: >> >> AIP-42:

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (binding) On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:08 AM Daniel Imberman wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to call for a vote on AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping: > > AIP-42: Dynamic Task Mapping - Airflow - Apache Software Foundation >

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

Definitely +1 (non-binding) Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 19:28, Daniel Standish wrote: > +1 (binding) > >>

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (binding)

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (binding) Just a reminder that Committers vote are binding to vote on AIP. Regards, Kaxil On Thu, Nov 18, 2021, 17:55 Vikram Koka wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Great work on the AIP, really looking forward to seeing this happen! > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:41 AM Brent Bovenzi > wrote: > >> +

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:55 AM Vikram Koka wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Great work on the AIP, really looking forward to seeing this happen! > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:41 AM Brent Bovenzi > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:21 AM Ry Walker wrote:

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (binding) Great work on the AIP, really looking forward to seeing this happen! On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:41 AM Brent Bovenzi wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:21 AM Ry Walker wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> can’t wait to see this elegant AIP materialize! >> >> >> On T

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:21 AM Ry Walker wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > can’t wait to see this elegant AIP materialize! > > > On Thu, Nov 18 2021 at 12:18 PM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 6:18 PM Tomasz Urbaszek >> wrote: >> > >> >> +1

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (non-binding) can’t wait to see this elegant AIP materialize! On Thu, Nov 18 2021 at 12:18 PM, Jarek Potiuk < ja...@potiuk.com > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 6:18 PM Tomasz Urbaszek > wrote: > > > > >> >> >> +1 (binding), love the idea! >> >> > >

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (binding) On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 6:18 PM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > > +1 (binding), love the idea!

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (binding), love the idea!

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (non-binding) Best, Chris Ash Berlin-Taylor schrieb am Do., 18. Nov. 2021, 18:09: > +1 (binding) clearly. > > -a > > On Thu, Nov 18 2021 at 09:08:29 -0800, Daniel Imberman < > daniel.imber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to call for a vote on AIP-42 Dynamic Task Ma

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (binding) I'm very excited about this AIP. On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 7:09 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > +1 (binding) clearly. > > -a > > On Thu, Nov 18 2021 at 09:08:29 -0800, Daniel Imberman < > daniel.imber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to call for a vote on AIP-42

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (binding) clearly. -a On Thu, Nov 18 2021 at 09:08:29 -0800, Daniel Imberman wrote: Hi everyone, I would like to call for a vote on AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping: AIP-42: Dynamic Task Mapping - Airflow - Apache Software Foundation

[VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

style="font-size: 15px;">style="">Hi everyone,style="">I would like to call for a vote on AIP-42  Dynamic Task Mapping:style="">href="https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-42%3A+Dynamic+Task+Mapping"; style="">AIP-42: Dynamic Task Mapping - Airflow - Apache Software FoundationD

Re: [DISCUSS] - AWSGlueWorkflowOperator

Hey no need for AIP for this -- you can just create a PR with the changes. AIP is only needed for architectural changes which needs discussions. On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 3:53 PM Rafa Carrasco wrote: > I recently created a custom GlueWorkflowOperator at work and think it > would be a good additio

[DISCUSS] - AWSGlueWorkflowOperator

I recently created a custom GlueWorkflowOperator at work and think it would be a good addition to the providers library. Not sure if this is major enough for an AIP but I do think it would be a nice add on. How can I start doing this? Thank you -- Rafa Carrasco Data Scientist/Data Engineer MS, Co

[VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.2.0 based on 2.2.0rc1

Hello everyone, I have cut the first release candidate for the Airflow Python Client 2.2.0. The client consists of APIs corresponding to REST APIs available in *Apache Airflow 2.2.2* release. This email is calling for a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours. Consider this my (binding)