I'd be for deprecating it. It's too easy to use with too much too
loose and too little value. I see no real "business" value in it.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 5:27 PM Daniel Standish
wrote:
>
> Yeah that's correct. Sorry, I should have used `pendulum.today`. But yeah
> also equivalent to `pendulu
Anyone who was more involved in deferred operators ?
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 5:14 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> We had some discussions recently in Slack and GitHub Issues, about a
> new approach that apparently we should take when it comes to hooks.
> Seems that the "new" approach
Merry Xmas :)
I have a warm feeling about keeping the providers as extras (but also
I'd love to hear what others think).
I only think we should change the extras to be "[providers.google],
[providers.amazon], [providers.cncf.kubernetes] ... " to keep them
easily separated from non-provider extras
Yeah that's correct. Sorry, I should have used `pendulum.today`. But yeah
also equivalent to `pendulum.today('UTC').add(days=-N)` *(while `days_ago`
uses timedelta it's the same when there's no DST is involved)*
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021, 1:59 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
> days_ago is not just the
days_ago is not just the same as utcnow minus N days, it is always "truncated"
to the start of the day, so it's closer to "utcnow().replace(hour=0, minute=0,
second=0) - timedelta(n)”
On 28 December 2021 00:08:53 GMT, Daniel Standish
wrote:
>I recall some time ago we removed `days_ago` from a
