Re: [DISCUSS] deprecate `days_ago` dates utility

+1 for deprecation as well. `days_ago()` was removed from example DAGs and other documentation since it was mainly being used for dynamic `start_date` values which is not a best practice in DAG authoring. Seemed to create more confusion and odd behavior than value. On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 7:00 PM

Re: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on December 31, 2021

+1 (non-binding) Verified a few bug fixes and ran some DAGs involving some of the providers in this RC. On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 5:11 PM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:41 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> one more +1 needed :) >> >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:38 PM K

Re: New PMC Member: Jed Cunningham

Congratulations Jed! well deserved. Cheers, — Jiajie Zhong

Re: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on December 31, 2021

+1 (binding) On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:41 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > one more +1 needed :) > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:38 PM Kamil Breguła wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > I checked *.asc and *.sha512 files and everything looks fine. > > > > pt., 31 gru 2021 o 22:44 Jarek Potiuk napisał(a): > > > > > >

Re: New PMC Member: Jed Cunningham

Congratulations, Jed!On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:13pm, Jorrick Sleijster wrote:Congratulations Jed! Great news and well deserved 🎊👌On Wed, 5 Jan 2022, 10:32 Tomasz Urbaszek, wrote:Congratulations Jed!On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 03:37, Ian Stanton wrote:Congrats

Re: New PMC Member: Jed Cunningham

Congratulations Jed! Great news and well deserved 🎊👌 On Wed, 5 Jan 2022, 10:32 Tomasz Urbaszek, wrote: > Congratulations Jed! > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 03:37, Ian Stanton > wrote: > >> Congrats Jed! >> >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022, 4:01 PM Dennis Akpenyi >> wrote: >> >>> Congratulations Jed! Well

Re: [DISCUSS] Leverage serialized DAG in airflow run local process to avoid dag parsing

Hi Kaxil, Jarek and Ash, Here is the AIP https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Remove+double+dag+parsing+in+airflow+run. Looking forward to your feedback. Thanks, Ping On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 10:46 AM Ping Zhang wrote: > Hi Kaxil, > > Thanks for the comment. The serialized_dag

Re: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on December 31, 2021

one more +1 needed :) On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:38 PM Kamil Breguła wrote: > > +1 > > I checked *.asc and *.sha512 files and everything looks fine. > > pt., 31 gru 2021 o 22:44 Jarek Potiuk napisał(a): > > > > Hey all, > > > > First of all - All the best in 2022! I wish all of you the 2022 (after

Re: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on December 31, 2021

+1 I checked *.asc and *.sha512 files and everything looks fine. pt., 31 gru 2021 o 22:44 Jarek Potiuk napisał(a): > > Hey all, > > First of all - All the best in 2022! I wish all of you the 2022 (after > 2020 and 2021) will be relatively uneventful :). > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow

Re: [DISCUSSION] Make one of the next provider waves (January or February) 2.3+ only for all providers

We need to be also mindful about the fact that not everyone is able to migrate to the new Airflow version as soon as it's being released. One of the concepts of providers is that it's not tightly bound to Airflow core - If we can give users more time before setting a minimum version of airflow 2.3

Re: [PROPOSAL] Removal of Python2 "virtualenv" support in Airlfow 2.3 ?

PR here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20680 On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 9:43 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 1:07 AM Leah Cole wrote: >> >> +1 for removal! >> >> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 7:22 AM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 16:19,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 31, 2021

We've got quite good coverage https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20615 - I need two more votes to release it. J, On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 10:47 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Hey all, > > First of all - All the best in 2022! I wish all of you all that 2022 (after > 2020 and 2021) will be relati

Re: New PMC Member: Jed Cunningham

Congratulations Jed! On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 03:37, Ian Stanton wrote: > Congrats Jed! > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022, 4:01 PM Dennis Akpenyi > wrote: > >> Congratulations Jed! Well deserved! >> >> On Tue 4. Jan 2022 at 21:56, Kevin Yang wrote: >> >>> Congrats Jed 👍 >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 10:3