Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that new versions of Airflow Providers packages
were just released.
The source release, as well as the binary releases, are available here:
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers/installing-from-sources
You can install the provider
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers (based on RC1) have been accepted.
4 “+1” binding votes received:
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
- Jed Cunningham (binding)
- Ephraim Anierobi (binding)
- Kaxil Naik (binding)
1 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Josh Fell (non-binding)
Vote thread:
https://lists.apac
And let me add to it - we laid some foundations for it with Melodie
Ezeani - the Outreachy intern where we did some internal integration
work that let us understand the challenges and state of
open-telemetry.
I am super excited about what open-telemetry can bring to Airflow -
both short term (in m
Hi all,
I am pleased to announce the start of the discussion for the new AIP draft
that was recently been published:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow
Jarek Potuik and I have been discussing about this proposal since early
this ye
Yes, that was roughly the idea Jarek - if the executor is only running
inside the scheduler and has no external process component, it'd be nice to
have a part of the "executor interface" that got called periodically for
cleanup (QUEUED or otherwise). In my internal executor experiments, we've
had t
+1 (binding)
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 at 13:53, Ephraim Anierobi
wrote:
> +1(binding)
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 10:45 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
>> One more to go :)
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:08 AM Jed Cunningham
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Checked signatures, checksums, and li
+1(binding)
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 10:45 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> One more to go :)
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:08 AM Jed Cunningham
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Checked signatures, checksums, and licences
>
One more to go :)
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:08 AM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked signatures, checksums, and licences
