How much bigger would the image be if we included postgres, mysql, and
mssql in the same image? That'd mean we'd have 4 vs 12 (ignoring the
platform piece), and might be worth the tradeoff.
I also like the idea of SLIM images - always helpful.
Howard
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 4:53 PM Ping Zhang wrote:
> Hi Jarek,
>
> I really like the idea of having a slim airflow docker image. 500MB
> uncompressed is tiny
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ping
>
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 8:41 AM Jarek Potiuk
Hi Jarek,
I really like the idea of having a slim airflow docker image. 500MB
uncompressed is tiny
Thanks,
Ping
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 8:41 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> And just to clarify. Those "slim" images are not at all "toothless". You
> can actually do stuff with them :)
>
> The 4
This is a very good point. I'd love to hear what others think about it. I
have my thoughts there but will keep my mouth shut for a while this time
to hear from others first :)
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 6:32 PM Robin Edwards wrote:
> This is probably slightly touching on the issues Jarek and Kevin
This is probably slightly touching on the issues Jarek and Kevin were
discussing in the release announcement however i think it warrants its
own thread.
Firstly i'd like to thank everyone for their hard work in 2.3, I
haven't had time to try it out yet but i do look forward giving it a
spin.
We
> Replacing one of the most used interfaces is a pretty big deal. I like
the grid view but it is not a superset of tree view, thus user workflows
can break with the change. Yes we can argue that people can update their
workflow and get used to it. But I'm not quite sure "we changed it to this,
get
