> +1 I agree this is a logical next step towards possibly separating
provider code from the Airflow code base (and it's useful even if we never
do that).
I am quite sure we will :)
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 1:18 AM Oliveira, Niko
wrote:
> +1 I agree this is a logical next step towards possibly
+1 I agree this is a logical next step towards possibly separating provider
code from the Airflow code base (and it's useful even if we never do that).
Cheers,
Niko
From: Kamil Breguła
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 1:30 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE:
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that new versions of Airflow Providers packages
were just released.
This is an ad-hoc release of an important bug-fix version of 8.1.0
google provider and linked 3.1.0 oracle provider only.
The source release, as well as the binary releases, are
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers from June 15 (based on RC1) have been accepted.
3 “+1” binding votes received:
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
- Kaxil Naik (binding)
- Jed Cunningham (binding)
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/onvpwn9wosqy529ovbtyh2ro8911cy22
I'll continue with the
+1 checked licenses, and checksums
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 20:57, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Yeah... I've learned since that there was a long weekend in US. There
> was one in Poland but it started on Thursday so seems like
> longish weekends overlapped :D
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:53 PM
