+1 (binding)
On Wed 16 Nov 2022 at 03:20, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:07 PM Oliveira, Niko
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey folks!
> >
> > I would like to start a vote for "AIP-51 - Removing Executor Coupling
> from Core Airlfow".
> >
> > You can find the AIP here:
>
> Not with every release. I am talking about releasing it with every release
> "if it is needed".
>
That clarifies, plz go ahead.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 5:15 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> And just to add one "clarifying" condition here:
>
> If we release Airflow 2.X.0 (the first release in the
+1 for Atmosphere
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:29 PM Tomasz Urbaszek
wrote:
> Atmosphere +1!
>
> T.
>
--
Pankaj Singh
Software Engineer, Astronomer Inc
| https://www.linkedin.com/in/pankajiam/
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:07 PM Oliveira, Niko
wrote:
>
> Hey folks!
>
> I would like to start a vote for "AIP-51 - Removing Executor Coupling from
> Core Airlfow".
>
> You can find the AIP here:
>
Hey folks!
I would like to start a vote for "AIP-51 - Removing Executor Coupling from Core
Airlfow".
You can find the AIP here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-51+Removing+Executor+Coupling+from+Core+Airlfow
Discussion threads:
Atmosphere +1!
T.
+1 for "Asmosphere", like it a lot.
Le mar. 15 nov. 2022 à 11:56, Pankaj Koti
a écrit :
> +1 to "Atmosphere"
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Pankaj Koti
>
> *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
> Location: Pune, India
>
> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
>
> Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
And just to add one "clarifying" condition here:
If we release Airflow 2.X.0 (the first release in the MINOR version,
the answer to "Do we need to release API Client ?" is always
"YES".
J.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:41 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> > we are talking about the same thing & on
> we are talking about the same thing & on the same page with versioning,
> though releasing clients with each Airflow release confuses me.
Not with every release. I am talking about releasing it with every
release "if it is needed". I do not see anything confusing here. The
logic is simple:
*
@Jarek Potiuk we are talking about the same thing & on
the same page with versioning, though releasing clients with each Airflow
release confuses me.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 4:04 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> >
> > There had been a discussion around this earlier, though I couldn't find
> the
Additional info:
Credit:
Apache Airflow PMC would like to thank James Srinivasan for reporting it.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 12:50 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> Severity: low
>
> Description:
>
> A vulnerability in UI of Apache Airflow allows an attacker to view unmasked
> secrets in rendered
+1 to "Atmosphere"
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 2:02 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Love the "Atmosphere" name
>
> There had been a discussion around this earlier, though I couldn't find the
> thread. So if we want to release clients with each Airflow release, then
> we've to move away from current semantic versioning, something which we had
> decided in that thread.
Why ? I think we do not have to do
13 matches
Mail list logo
