Re: [PROPOSAL] (slightly) change approach to default config values

+1 binding - long overdue On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 23:59, Ping Zhang wrote: > Hi Jarek, > > It makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. > > Thanks, > > Ping > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 12:23 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> > Are you planning to enforce this pattern when new parameters are >> introd

Re: [VOTE] AIP-50 Trigger DAG UI Extension with Flexible User Form Concept

+1 binding On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 at 16:09, Constance Martineau wrote: > I somehow missed the discussion for this earlier. I can't comment on > implementation, but the feature itself is really cool and such a useful > addition! This is a bit presumptuous since there hasn't been a vote yet, > but I'

Re: [VOTE] AIP-50 Trigger DAG UI Extension with Flexible User Form Concept

I somehow missed the discussion for this earlier. I can't comment on implementation, but the feature itself is really cool and such a useful addition! This is a bit presumptuous since there hasn't been a vote yet, but I'm looking forward to seeing this officially part of the project :) On Fri, Dec

[VOTE] AIP-50 Trigger DAG UI Extension with Flexible User Form Concept

Hi Airflow Developers, sorry, new to the process after discussion we had in previous emails in https://lists.apache.org/thread/kxkctcbh9drfw065dgvr673zl0xyfl3r and the Confluence in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-50+Trigger+DAG+UI+Extension+with+Flexible+User+Form+Conce